Saturday, December 13, 2025

Jubilee Pardon Petition to Pope Leo XIV


“A good Christian knows—and knows it from his Catechism—that true Religion consists in the true faith; it consists in Revelation, which concluded with the death of the last Apostle and is entrusted to the Church, which is its interpreter and guardian.”
(Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani)

12-12-25, In Tua Justitia Libera me Domine, by A. di J.

Dear friends and readers,

Today, December 12, on the liturgical memorial of Our Lady of Guadalupe, patroness of the Americas and of Mexico, we entrust to Her—who is Mediatrix of all graces and Mother of the Church—this supplication which we, the People of God, address to the Supreme Pontiff, raising prayers to God to ask for Her intercession, protection, and guidance for the Pope, so that he may lead the Church with wisdom, divine illumination, and strength, especially in difficult times such as these, and for peace and concord within the Church, invoking upon Her divine support.

When has it ever been like this…?

This is an expression meant to say that although in the recent or distant past there have been difficulties, misunderstandings, and various kinds of “unease”—and this can happen with regard to any subject—nevertheless, things have never reached this point! Yes… anyone in the Catholic Church today finds it difficult to hide the embarrassment when seeing, hearing, or learning certain things that truly clash even with sensitivities far removed from what is considered, or above all believed, to be “sacred.” In matters of faith, one cannot play seesaw, nor can one believe in revealed truths only to then interpret them according to one’s own opinion. In her great humility and wisdom, the Church has always held that the truths of faith themselves are the precious treasure to be safeguarded.

These truths are not to be kept in a safe as if they were jewels at risk of being stolen. Very often, precisely with regard to precious objects, this happens: they are kept locked away, without giving anyone the possibility of admiring them. What purpose do they serve, if not to lose their splendor? On the contrary, the Church makes the revealed truths of faith the object of her proclamation, her witness, and even her suffering unto martyrdom, if necessary. Yet she always safeguards them with respect and love. The Church has also always wished to create an “ad hoc” body to do this. Over the centuries it has taken on various names, up to the current one, namely the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Certainly, within the internal organization of the Church and in relation to the person of the Pope, it is the reality that requires the greatest responsibility, seriousness, and respect, precisely because of the “matter” it deals with. Sacred history, as made by the Church, has offered us wonderful pages concerning this body. The temptation is always to think and say that in the past they made mistakes, and that only today are we capable of correctly interpreting and concretely implementing the right way to help the People of God treasure the deposit of faith. If that were so, we would be overly proud, and surely those who come after us would not be slow to point it out.

With these reflections, as the People of God, we ask you, Holy Father, to turn your gaze to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. In these first months of your pontificate, you have offered us the image of a man of God who listens, discerns, and, when necessary, intervenes even by revisiting at the root positions previously taken. Everyone appreciates the delicacy with which you seek to “adjust,” without clamor, certain decisions of your predecessor. This is undoubtedly very beautiful and offers an image of true Christian charity. Now, Holy Father, welcoming the “sense” of so many among the People of God, we ask you, for the good of the Church and also of the person concerned, to replace the current prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Fernández.

We do not wish to enter into the merits of the motivations that led Pope Francis to want him in that role. However, we cannot pretend nothing is happening regarding the fact that from the very beginning, when it was announced that he would be the prefect, very many people expressed their disapproval, particularly in his homeland, Argentina. There have been too many pronouncements in these years, since he became prefect, imbued with ambiguity; this has necessarily required continual new interventions to clarify, to deepen, to revise what had previously been said. Moreover, in light of what was known from the beginning and has returned to the forefront in recent days, Cardinal Fernández, due to a personal inclination toward a certain literary style, is certainly not the most suitable person to hold this role. Those who remain silent, who do not speak out, are not necessarily in agreement with this person and his style. Quite simply, we are witnessing a resignation on the part of many regarding this person and this issue, but the unease exists and remains. Cardinal Fernández may do well, and even better, on another front, but not on this one. Holiness, we ask this for the good of the Church, not out of resentment toward the person of the cardinal. The embarrassment is now great, and it is clear that even he is embarrassed, because his empathy was probably greater with Pope Francis.

Finally, Holiness, before the Jubilee ends, we ask of you a great act of courage that would become a great testimony of faith, of spiritual fatherhood, and of true fraternity. In past years, many priests and bishops have become rigid precisely over issues concerning the interpretation of the faith and its applications. Many of them have suffered censures up to excommunication. What more beautiful gesture could there be, before the end of the Jubilee, than to announce your desire to meet them all, listening to what they have to say? They are pastors who have given their lives out of love for Christ, the Gospel, and the faith. They have accepted humiliations and condemnations. We beg you, Holiness… make this act of true mercy. Many of the burdens that were laid upon these sacred ministers could have been avoided simply by listening to them and speaking with them. It was not done then, but it can be done now. What a great message the holy People of God would receive!

Holiness, we reaffirm our love for the Church, for your person, and for the extraordinary mission that God has entrusted to you.

May the Lord bless and protect you always, together with the Blessed Virgin Mary, Regina Crucis!

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Paul VI "Smoke of Satan" Homily: Unpublished English Full Text


This, the most famous homily of Pope Saint Paul VI, apparently has no official English translation by the Vatican, to this day! It was duly published in the original Italian and in the official Spanish translation (below) by the Vatican newspaper L'osservatore Romano in the weekly edition of 30 of June - 1 of July 1972, and those texts are also not accessible online! What is more, the Vatican website today does not provide this homily in any language! Nor does it appear in the official documents of the Vatican Acta Apostolica Sedes (AAS). This homily is listed in the vatican.va chronological list of Paul VI's homilies, but what is give is a cheap summary of this masterful discourse! Indeed, as asserted by Pope Saint Paul VI, the Enemy has many earthly agents who sow confusion, and censor the truth to try to remain unexposed. Below is my translation. --Plinthos



Homily "Be Strong in the Faith" – Saint Paul VI


Mass of June 29, 1972, commemorating the ninth anniversary of his coronation as Pope on June 30, 1963, after being elected on June 21, 1963.
L’Osservatore Romano, June 30 – July 1, 1972.
(Spanish edition, July 9, 1972, pp. 1–2)

We must thank you and all those who, absent from Rome, are present in spirit, for your attendance at this rite which aims to have a twofold intention. The first—and it is sufficient—is to honor Saints Peter and Paul, especially since we are in the basilica where we find ourselves, over the tomb and relics of the Apostle Peter; to honor these princes of the apostles and to honor Christ in them, and to feel led by them to Christ, for we owe them this great inheritance of faith. And, moreover, the other intention is that we cannot be insensitive to commemorating the ninth anniversary of our election—as successor of Peter—to the Roman Pontificate and, we say it trembling, to the position of visible representative on Earth, vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

We thank you from the heart, also, because this presence assures us of what is most alive and ardent in our desires: your adherence, your fidelity, your communion, your unity in prayer and in faith, and in the constitution of this mysterious visible and earthly society called the Church, and for feeling ourselves here particularly as Church, united in Jesus Christ as in one body; also because we trust that this presence signifies help, prayer, indulgence for the one speaking to you and also prayer for Us, for our office, for the mission that the Lord entrusted to Us for the good of the Church and the world. And this prayer will truly serve Us as a great support to humbly and strongly fulfill our difficult task.

We feel authorized to yield the floor to Saint Peter himself and to beg him to say one of his words among the many beautiful ones he left us in the two canonical epistles that we preserve in the body of Sacred Scripture, and we choose those that speak of you. Saint Peter speaks of the community, the nascent Church, in the first letter—strange, yet expressive—that he sent from Rome to the churches of the East, to the churches of Asia Minor, as informed exegetes say, and which, according to his custom, he wrote not to make new doctrinal communications—as Saint Paul usually did—but to exhort. One feels the pastor who wants to incite, encourage, and give awareness of what the Christian people is and what it must do. In this first letter of Saint Peter, with profound clarity and sharpness, the entire range of new sentiments that must have life and burst forth with impetus from the Christian heart is touched upon. Among the many words that the letter contains, we present these to you for your meditation, with a brief commentary; Saint Peter says:

“You are a chosen generation, a kingly priesthood, a holy nation, a purchased people: that you may declare his virtues, who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: Who in time past were not a people: but are now the people of God. Who had not obtained mercy; but now have obtained mercy.” 1 Peter 2:9-10

Here is what We submit for a moment to your reflection.

Royal Priesthood

These are words that have been much studied in recent years, especially because they have been the axis of the doctrine of the Council in its main chapter, that is, in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, where precisely this picture of the people of God is described.

Yes; we tell you that in this moment proper to prayer, poor as we are, the Lord inspires us to understand things. We imagine having before Us, almost extended in panorama, the entire Holy Catholic Church, and we see it—with the characteristics that Saint Peter indicates—in a unity; gathered in this principle—Christ—for this end: to glorify him; for this benefit: to be saved; for this transfiguration, almost for this metamorphosis that is initiated in each of those who compose this community of a supernatural order, by the discovery of the vocation in each of the components of this great human mass, of this great sea of Humanity, in which each one is personally called as a member of the multitude, personally called—according to what the Apocalypse says about the last day—to receive a new name.

If I remember correctly, the Lord says in the text, that we are all called to exercise, to compose, a royal priesthood. Here there is a reminiscence of the Old Testament—that of Exodus—when God, speaking to Moses before giving him the Law, says: "I will make of this people a priestly and royal people." Saint Peter takes up this so great, so exalting word, and applies it to the new people of God, heir and continuer of the Israel of the Bible, to form a new Israel, the Israel of Christ. Saint Peter says: "It will be the priestly and royal people who will glorify the God of mercy, the God of salvation."

We know that this word has sometimes been misunderstood, as if the priesthood were one single order, that is, as if it were communicated to all those inserted into the Mystical Body of Christ, to all who are Christians. In a certain sense it is true, and we usually call it the common priesthood, but the Council tells us—and Tradition had already taught us—that there exists another degree, another state of priesthood: the ministerial priesthood, which has particular and exclusive faculties and prerogatives, precisely of the ministerial priesthood.

But let us pause on what concerns everyone: the royal priesthood. Here we should ask ourselves what priesthood means, but the explanations would never end, and therefore we limit ourselves and content ourselves with this: priest means capacity to render worship to God, to communicate with Him, to seek Him always in a new depth, in a new discovery, in a new love. This impulse of Humanity toward God, which has not been sufficiently reached nor sufficiently known, is the priesthood of one who is inserted into the only Priest who, after the advent of the New Testament, is Christ. It is that the Christian is endowed, by that very fact, with this quality, this prerogative of being able to speak to the Lord in true terms, as from son to father.

What Distinguishes the Christian

Audemus dicere: we can truly celebrate before the Lord a rite, a liturgy of common prayer, a sanctification of even profane life, which distinguishes the Christian from the non-Christian. This people is different, although it may be confused in the great tide of Humanity. It has its distinction, its unmistakable characteristic. Saint Paul defined himself as segregatus, separated, distinct from the rest of Humanity, precisely for being invested with prerogatives and functions that those who do not possess the supreme fortune and excellence of being members of Christ do not have.

Then we must consider that we, those called to be children of God, to participate in the Mystical Body of Christ, who are animated by the Holy Spirit and made temples of the presence of God, must carry out this colloquy, this dialogue, this conversation with God in religion, in liturgical worship, in private worship, and we must extend the sense of sacredness even to profane actions. "Whether you eat or drink," said Saint Paul, "do it for the glory of God." And he says it repeatedly in his letters, as if to reclaim for the Christian the capacity to infuse something new, to illuminate, to sacralize also temporal, external, ephemeral, profane things.

Desacralization

We are exhorted to give to the Christian people, called the Church, a truly sacred sense. And by affirming it thus, we feel that we must restrain the wave of profaneness, desacralization, secularization, which rises, which oppresses and which wants to confuse and overflow the religious sense in the secret of the heart—in exclusively secret private life, or also in the external manifestations of life—of all personal interiority, or even make it disappear. It is affirmed that there is no longer any reason to distinguish one man from another, that exists that can establish such a distinction. Even more: one must return to man his authenticity; one must return to man his true being, which is common to all others.

But the Church, and today Saint Peter, calling the Christian people to self-awareness, tell it that it is the chosen people, distinct, acquired by Christ, a people that must exercise a particular relationship with God, a priesthood with God. This sacralization of life today must not be erased, expelled from customs and from our life, as if it should no longer belong. We have lost religious habits, we have lost many other external manifestations of religious life. Regarding this, there is much to discuss and much to concede, but it is necessary to maintain the concept, and with the concept also some sign of the sacrality of the Christian people, that is, of those inserted into Christ, the High and Eternal Priest.

This will also tell us that we must feel a great religious fervor. Currently, there is a part of the studies of Humanity—the so-called sociology—that disregards this contact with God. On the contrary, the sociology of Saint Peter, the sociology of the Church, when studying men, highlights precisely this sacral aspect, of conversation with the Ineffable, with God, with the divine world, and this must be affirmed in the study of all human differentiations.

However heterogeneous the human race may appear, we must not forget this fundamental truth that the Lord confers on us when he gives us grace: we are all brothers in the same Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, Scythian or barbarian, man or woman. We are all one in Christ; we are all sanctified; we all participate to this degree in the supernatural elevation that Christ conferred on us, and Saint Peter reminds us of it; it is the sociology of the Church that we must not make disappear or forget.

Defections

Returning to look at that panorama to which we alluded—the great plane of human life, the entire Church—what do we see? If we are asked what the Church is today, can it be calmly confronted with the words that Peter left us as inheritance and meditation? Can we be at ease? Can we not see the Church in an ideology that obliges us to some reflection, to some attitude, to some effort and to some virtue that becomes characteristic of the Christian?

We think again in this moment—with immense charity—of all our brothers who abandon us, of many who are fugitives and forget, of many who perhaps never managed to have awareness of the Christian vocation although they have received baptism. We would very truly like to extend our hand to them and tell them that the heart is always open, that crossing the threshold is easy. We would very much like to make them participants in the great and ineffable fortune of our happiness, that of being in communication with God, which takes nothing away from us of the temporal vision and the positive realism of the external world. Perhaps it obliges us to renunciations, to sacrifices, but while it deprives us of something, it multiplies its gifts. It imposes renunciations on us, but it provides us abundantly with other riches. We are not poor, we are rich, because we have the wealth of the Lord.

Now, we would like to say to these brothers—from whom we feel the tear in the bowels of our priestly soul—how much we have them present, how much—now and always, and more and more—we love them, and how much we pray for them, and how much we strive with this effort that pursues and surrounds them to make up for the breach that they themselves make of our communion in Christ.

Doubt, Uncertainty, Unease

Then there is another category, and to it we all somewhat belong. And I would say that this category characterizes the Church of today. It would seem that through some crack the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God. There is doubt, uncertainty, problems, unease, dissatisfaction, confrontation. There is no longer trust in the Church; more trust is placed in the first profane prophet—who comes to speak to us from some newspaper or some social movement—to follow him and ask him if he has the formula for true life; and, on the contrary, we do not realize that we are already owners and masters of it.

Doubt has entered our consciences and it has entered through windows that should have been open to the light: science. But science is made to give us truths that do not distance us from God, but make us seek Him even more and celebrate Him with greater intensity. On the contrary, from science has come criticism, doubt regarding everything that exists and everything we know. Scientists are those who most pensively and painfully lower their foreheads and end up teaching: "I don't know, we don't know, we cannot know." It is true that science tells us the limits of our knowledge, but everything it provides us positively should be certainty, should be impetus, should be enrichment, should increase our capacity for prayer and hymn to the Lord; and, on the contrary, behold, teaching becomes an arena of confusion, of plurality that no longer agrees, of sometimes absurd contradictions.

Progress is exalted only to then be able to demolish it with the strangest and most radical revolutions, to deny everything that has been conquered, to return to being primitive after having so exalted the progresses of the modern world.

Also in us, those of the Church, this state of uncertainty reigns. It was believed that after the Council a day of sun would come for the history of the Church. On the contrary, a day of clouds has come, of storm, of darkness, of searching, of uncertainty, and one feels fatigue in giving the joy of faith. We preach ecumenism and we distance ourselves more and more from others.

The Devil’s Intervention

How has all this happened? We confide our thought to you: there has been a power, an adverse power. Let us say its name: the Devil. This mysterious being who is in Saint Peter's own letter—on which we are commenting—and to whom allusion is made so many times in the Gospel—on the lips of Christ—the mention of this enemy of man returns. We believe in something preternatural that has come into the world precisely to disturb, to suffocate the fruits of the Ecumenical Council and to prevent the Church from bursting forth in the hymn of jubilation for having full awareness of Herself once again.

Precisely for this reason, we would like to be able, now more than ever, of exercising the function that God entrusted to Peter to confirm the brothers in the faith. We would like to communicate this charism of certainty that the Lord gives to the one who represents him, even unworthily, on this earth. And to tell you that faith—when it is founded on the word of God, accepted and placed in conformity with our own human spirit—gives us a truly sure certainty. Whoever believes with simplicity, with humility; he knows he is on the good path; he feels that he has an interior testimony that confirms us in our difficult ideology and comforts us in the difficult conquest of truth.

The Lord manifests Himself as light and truth to the one who accepts Him in his word, and His word does not become an obstacle to truth and to the path toward being, but the rung by which we can ascend and truly be conquerors of the Lord, who comes to meet us and gives himself today through this methodology, this path of faith that is a foretaste and guarantee of the definitive vision.

Strong in the Faith

And then We see the third aspect, which we like so much to contemplate, the great extension of believing Humanity. We see a great number of humble, simple, pure, upright, strong souls, who believe, who are—according to what Saint Peter says at the end of his epistle—“fortes in fide” ("strong in faith"). 1 Peter 5:9 And we would like this strength of faith, this security, this peace, to triumph over the obstacles that life—our own experience and the phenomenology of things—place before us, and that we may always be strong in the faith.

Brothers, we do not say strange, difficult, or absurd things. We would only like you to experience an act of faith, in humility and sincerity; a psychological effort that tells us to ourselves that we try to perform a conscious action. Is it true? Is it not true? Do I accept? Do I not accept? Yes, Lord, I believe in your word; I believe in your Revelation; I believe in the one whom You have given me as witness and guarantee of this Your Revelation, to feel and taste, with the strength of faith, the anticipation of the blessedness of the life that has been promised to us with the faith.

Cf. Paul VI's November 15, 1972 Wednesday Audience on the last petition of the Pater Noster "Deliver Us From Evil" in which he continues to speak of the role of the devil in the world. Español.

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

Poem for Vatican II at LX


Peter A. Kwasniewski
December 8, 2025
60th Anniversary of the Close of Vatican II


Good Pope John, he summoned a council, a jolly big council he called,
With a spirit so bold, midst a war so cold, that critics were appalled.
He set up commissions and gave them permissions:
Let the old-time religion be overhauled!

First to be passed was a document vast—
by name, Sacrosanctum Concilium,
which gave the barbarians plenty of room
To consign our mystic worship to its (happily temporary) doom.

Second off the press was a thing of low stress,
Inter Mirifica—in forma specifica,
It sought illumination on social communication.
It’s a text no one remembers, consigned to the embers.

Third came a constitution, dogmatic in scope,
That spoke of a hierarchy topped by the pope,
And the People of God as a light to the nations:
Lumen Gentium, one of the council’s better creations
(as long as one resists a grin at the vexing phrase “subsistit in”).

Unitatis Redintegratio may not be a household name,
But this decree brought trouble all the same,
for it was no longer clear that conversion was the aim.
With Protestants, the idea was “be chummy,”
Don’t let past polemics make you glummy.

What about the East, with its splendiferous feast
For eye and ear, of raiment, icon, chant, perfume?
A decree entitled Orientalium Ecclesiarum
Met the genuine need: “Be very Eastern, please, with speed!”
(For if you are Byzantine, you get a pass for weirdness,
Directly proportional to your virile beardness.)

In Christus Dominus on mitred men, we hear
How they from vice and error must keep clear.
Sadly, this important memo went astray
From 1965 down to the present day.

Presbyterum Ordinis highlights the priests:
If they are lukewarm, the sheep will be beasts,
But if they are good, the folks will be decent.
There’s no sense denying this law, old and recent.
And if they are saints, the flock will be good:
Behold, the Christian neighborhood.

Optatam Totius on forming future clerics
Has nothing that would detonate cholerics;
Its ringing command, “Take St. Thomas in hand,”
Suffers avoidance by sundry McCarricks.

The decree on religious renewal, Perfectae Caritatis,
Gave occasion for nuns to turn naughties,
As they tore off their veils and polished their nails,
While their brothers in brown, OFM, OCD,
Even black and white robes, OSB and OP,
Followed the fashions with all of their passions,
In pursuit of unholy grails.

With the Decree on Laity, Apostolicam Actuositatem,
The gathered council fathers thought, “Now we’ve got ’em!
The laity will find their feet and voices!”
Sadly, be it noted, with their feet they voted,
And better to say even less of their choices.
An irony sweet, from the Paraclete, 
An irony sweet, from the Paraclete,
Is the evident rise of the trad laity,
Known for their offspring, boldness, and gaeity.

Nostra Aetate declared, with novelty bared,
That Christians and Muslims adore the same God,
That Hindus and Buddhists and bushwhacking nudists
Are mystics of nature, for dialogue ripe—
Assertions our forefathers might have called “tripe.”

Gravissimum Educationis is a mouthful indeed
For a text so modest it adheres to the creed.
It means “the graviest drawing out,” which surely alludes
To ladels in kitchens for feeding our broods.

On revelation, faith, and handing down,
Dei Verbum wears the brightest crown.
Its careful brevity is striking in comparison
With all the rest of the documentary garrison.
It is often said to say what it does not say—
A problem that never seems to go away.

Most vexatious of all, causing fights in the hall,
Was the document so liberal it seemed to recall
The very pollution of the French Revolution:
I speak, of course, of Dignitatis Humanae,
Which irritates Lefebvrists to this day.
There are at least a hundred and one interpretations;
Giving it resemblance to the famous Dalmatians.

The grave and zealous authors of Ad Gentes
Knew nothing of the future Nick Fuentes,
But their urging on of missions to all races
Shows a different line of thought about God’s graces.

Last, and actually least, was a constitution pastoral, Gaudium et Spes,
A sprawling counter-Syllabus that would have baffled St. Thérèse,
So full of joy and hope that one peritus, Ratzinger by name,
Would later brand it “downright Pelagian”—no minor blame.
Though John Paul Two found some of it true,
Sixty years after, it provokes laughter.

No human work is perfect—that is fate’s decree;
Not even Roman councils from that doom are free.
Yet works divinely wrought may come with blemish none,
Especially if they are from and for God’s Son.
Our Lady, fairest child of Adam, is the One
In Whom Our Lord outdid the rest that He had done:
The sinless Virgin Mother, filled with every grace,
The Queen and Co-Redemptrix of the human race.
To her we consecrate our life, our mind, our heart,
For Mary, well we know it, chose the better part.
If sixty years of chaos took a mortal toll,
’Twill be forgotten as the endless ages roll.

Pope Benedict XVI: Augustinian at Heart


Pope Benedict’s theological legacy: An Augustinian at heart who influenced the course of Vatican II and beyond


The late Cardinal Joachim Meisner, archbishop of Cologne, once described Joseph Ratzinger as the “Mozart of theology.” Others have suggested that Carl Maria von Weber or Anton Bruckner might be a better comparison. Both are emblematic of Austro-German romanticism.

Ratzinger was interested in the relationship between love and truth, affectivity as well as objectivity, the significance of history for personal formation, the historical character of revelation, and the role of beauty in evangelization. History, beauty and love and the relation of all three to the formation of the human person are core Romantic movement interests and, in the style of Bruckner, Ratzinger wove together his analyses of these relationships in strongly polyphonic essays using rich, harmonic language. He managed to bring to the fore these neglected elements in Catholic thought without jettisoning what had come to be regarded as the classical elements. In this sense Ratzinger was the theological analogue of a musical synthesis of Mozart and von Weber or Bruckner, if such a thing were possible. For those who wanted the romantic element without the classical he was considered a dangerous reactionary, and for those who wanted the classical without the romantic he was seen as a dangerous liberal.

Augustinian at Heart

The generations ahead will form their own judgments based on the volumes of his published works, which include over 60 books and magisterial documents spanning his quarter-century partnership with Pope John Paul II as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and his own almost-eight-year papacy. They will no doubt regard him as one of the six most significant Catholic theologians of the 20th century, along with Karl Rahner, S.J., Yves Congar, O.P., the Rev. Romano Guardini, Henri de Lubac, S.J., and the Rev. Hans Urs von Balthasar. The first two were fellow theological experts at the Second Vatican Council, with whom he had positive collaborations (though he later distanced himself from those aspects of Rahner’s anthropology that derived from elements in German idealist philosophy, and unlike Congar, resigned from the editorial board of the theological journal Concilium as it veered away from official magisterial teaching in the 1970s). The latter three were all, in different contexts, his intellectual heroes. De Lubac was also a fellow expert at the council. Ratzinger once wrote that it was impossible for him to say how much he owed to de Lubac and von Balthasar.

In searching for a short statement that might encapsulate the vast range of Ratzinger’s polyphonic contributions, I came across the following passage in Memory in Augustine’s Theological Anthropology (2012), by Paige E. Hochschild: 
God moves the intellect and will through the knowledge that comes through the memory. The universal, for Augustine, can be perceived only through the particular. This must, therefore, happen through history, through the visible, sensible works of Christ, through the practice of the virtues, the love of one’s neighbor, the life of the church, its sacraments, and above all its scripture. From these experiences, a person has an intimation of what the happiness of the caelum caeli consists in. 

One can easily substitute the name Ratzinger for Augustine in this passage and have a summary statement of Ratzinger’s theological vision. In his own words, Ratzinger was “a decided Augustinian,” and like Augustine, he believed that God could be perceived only in the particular. He wrote in Principles of Catholic Theology (1982):

Man finds his center of gravity, not inside, but outside himself. The place to which he is anchored is not, as it were, within himself, but without. This explains that remnant that remains always to be explained, the fragmentary character of all his efforts to comprehend the unity of history and being. Ultimately, the tension between ontology and history has its foundation in the tension within human nature itself, which must go out of itself in order to find itself; it has its foundation in the mystery of God, which is freedom and which, therefore, calls each individual by a name that is known to no other. Thus, the whole is communicated to him in the particular.

God in History

In the same work Ratzinger described the problem of “coming to an understanding of the mediation of history within the realm of ontology” as nothing less than the “fundamental crisis of our age.”

Post-Tridentine scholasticism had prided itself on its rejection of what was perceived to be a Protestant fixation on history. But in an intellectual landscape highly influenced by German Romanticism and the philosophy of Martin Heidegger, the Catholic engagement with history could not be left unattended without the church’s scholars losing all intellectual credibility. It was the Munich circle of scholars who were at the forefront of the engagement following the leads of the 19th-century Tübingen theologians and working on trajectories similar to those of John Henry Newman. It was within this milieu that the young Joseph Ratzinger came to the attention of Cardinal Josef Frings of Cologne who invited him to attend the Vatican II as his theological expert.

The document of the council that carries the strongest evidence of Ratzinger’s involvement is the “Dogmatic Constitution on Divine Revelation.” In this document the Suarezian account of revelation as something fundamentally propositional, “a clutch-purse of doctrines,” as it is sometimes described, was set aside in favor of a historical account that presents Christ himself as the revelation of God the Father to humanity. Following Romano Guardini, Ratzinger argued, “Revelation does not reveal something, nor does it reveal various kinds of things, but in the man Jesus, in the man who is God, we are able to understand the whole nature of man.” In Ratzinger’s best-selling work Introduction to Christianity (1968), which was translated into 17 languages, he explained the idea in these terms:

Christian belief is not merely concerned, as one might at first suspect from all the talk of belief or faith, with the eternal, which as the “entirely Other” would remain completely outside the human world and time; on the contrary, it is much more concerned with God in history, with God as man. By thus seeming to bridge the gulf between eternal and temporal, between visible and invisible, by making us meet God as a man, the eternal as the temporal, as one of us, it understands itself as revelation.
Given Ratzinger’s interest in the way God relates to the human person through individual moments in history, it is no surprise that two of his favorite theological topics were the theological virtues (faith, hope and love) and eucharistic theology. The theological virtues are central to the human person’s development and friendship with God; and it is through the reception of the sacraments, and in particular the Eucharist, that one grows in this friendship.

This friendship does not involve the absorption of the individual into God but rather to the transformation of difference into the higher union of love. The path to this higher union involves conversion and purification and as such takes the shape of the cross.

Included in his analysis of the theological virtues (which owes much to the work of Josef Pieper, the Thomist philosopher who fatefully introduced him to Cardinal Wojtyła) is an account of the way in which the virtues have undergone mutations within modern and postmodern culture. People still believe things, hope for things and love things, but in ways that are highly problematic. There is more faith in science than in Christ, more hope for material prosperity than for eternal life, and widespread confusion about how to relate eros with agape. There is also confusion about how to relate faith to reason. Here it is significant that when Ratzinger spoke of “reason” he did not mean the same thing as Immanuel Kant. His understanding of this relationship was Augustinian, not post-Kantian, and explains his aversion to some schools of preconciliar Thomism. Philosophy should not be the pure reason of Kant or René Descartes but should accept the contribution of divine revelation and thus partner with theology in seeking to analyze the fruits of revelation. This makes a significant difference to Christian epistemology.

It is sometimes said that the United States did not have a 19th century. The Romantic philosophy so pervasive in continental (especially German) thought in that century did not make the Atlantic crossing. Perhaps that is why it is still possible to find American Catholics who find it difficult to understand why anyone would say that the most serious theological crisis of the 20th century was coming to an understanding of the mediation of history in the realm of ontology. For those who do get the point that Catholic scholarship has little or no credibility without this and that the new evangelization depends upon the church’s scholars getting this right, the theological works of Joseph Ratzinger will continue to offer insights into fragments of the problem.

Joseph Ratzinger’s life was one long heroic intellectual performance, engaging his whole heart—a theo-drama with all the pathos of a Bayreuth festival. In Ratzinger’s case, however, Bavarian Catholic piety triumphed over whatever it is in the German spirit that remains nostalgic for pagan heroics.

Monday, December 8, 2025

"Smoke of Satan" Homily Full Text (English and Spanish)


Homily “Be Strong in the Faith” – Saint Paul VI*

Mass of June 29, 1972, commemorating the ninth anniversary of his coronation as Pope on June 30, 1963, after being elected on June 21, 1963.
L’Osservatore Romano, June 30–July 1, 1972.
(Spanish Edition, July 9, 1972, pp. 1–2)

We must thank you and all those who, though absent from Rome, are present in spirit, for your attendance at this rite which seeks to have a twofold intention. The first—and it is enough—is to honor Saints Peter and Paul, especially because we are in the basilica in which we find ourselves, above the tomb and relics of the Apostle Peter; to honor these princes of the apostles and to honor Christ in them, and to feel ourselves carried by them to Christ, for we owe to them this great inheritance of the faith. And the other intention is that we cannot remain unmoved in commemorating the ninth anniversary of our election—as successor of Peter—to the Roman Pontificate and, we say it trembling, to the position of visible representative on Earth, vicar of Our Lord Jesus Christ.

We thank you from our heart also because this presence assures us of what is most alive and ardent in our desires: your adhesion, your fidelity, your communion, your unity in prayer and in faith, and in the constitution of this mysterious visible and earthly society which is called the Church, and because we feel ourselves here to be particularly the Church, united in Jesus Christ as in one single body; also because we trust that this presence signifies help, prayer, indulgence for the one who speaks to you, and also prayer for Us, for our office, for the mission that the Lord has entrusted to Us for the good of the Church and of the world. And this prayer will truly serve Us as a great support to carry out our labor humbly and firmly.

We feel authorized to yield the word to Saint Peter himself and to ask him to speak one of his many beautiful words that he left us in the two canonical epistles that we preserve in the body of Sacred Scripture, and we choose those that speak of you. Saint Peter speaks of the community, the nascent Church, in the first letter—strange, yet expressive—that he sent from Rome to the churches of the East, to the churches of Asia Minor, as informed exegetes say, and which, according to his custom, he wrote not to make new doctrinal communications—as Saint Paul usually did—but to exhort. One feels the pastor who wants to incite, encourage, and give awareness of what the Christian people are and what they must do. In this first letter of Saint Peter there is touched, with profound clarity and sharpness, the whole range of new sentiments that must be alive and burst forth with impetus from the Christian heart. Among the many words the letter contains, we present to you these, which we leave to your meditation, with a brief commentary; Saint Peter says:

“You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people of his own, so that you may proclaim the virtues of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. You who once were not a people are now God’s people; you who had not obtained mercy now have obtained mercy.” 1 Peter 2:9-10

Here is what We submit for a moment to your reflection.


A Royal Priesthood

These are words that have been much studied in recent years, especially because they have been the axis of the doctrine of the Council in its principal chapter, that is, in the Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, where precisely this picture of the people of God is described.

Yes; we tell you that in this moment of prayer, poor as we are, the Lord inspires us to understand these things. We imagine having before Us, almost spread out like a panorama, the entire Holy Catholic Church, and we see it—with the characteristics that Saint Peter indicates—in a unity; gathered in this principle—Christ—for this end: to glorify Him; for this benefit: to be saved; for this transfiguration, almost for this metamorphosis that has begun in each one of those who compose this community of supernatural order, through the discovery of the vocation in each of the members of this great human mass, this great sea of Humanity, in which each is personally called as a member of the multitude, personally called—as the Apocalypse says about the last day—to receive a new name.

If I remember well, the Lord says in the text that we are all called to exercise, to compose, a royal priesthood. Here there is a reminiscence of the Old Testament—of Exodus—when God, speaking to Moses before giving him the Law, says: “I will make of this people a priestly and royal people.” Saint Peter takes up this word so great, so exalting, and applies it to the new people of God, heir and continuer of the Israel of the Bible, to form a new Israel, the Israel of Christ. Saint Peter says: “It will be the priestly and royal people who will glorify the God of mercy, the God of salvation.”

We know that this word has sometimes been misunderstood, as if the priesthood were one single order, that is, communicated to all who are inserted into the Mystical Body of Christ, to all who are Christians. In a certain sense it is true, and we usually call it the common priesthood, but the Council tells us—and Tradition had already taught us—that another degree exists, another state of priesthood: the ministerial priesthood, which has faculties and particular and exclusive prerogatives proper to the ministerial priesthood.

But let us pause at what concerns all: the royal priesthood. Here we should ask ourselves what priesthood means, but the explanations would never end, and therefore we limit ourselves and settle for this: priest means capacity to render worship to God, to communicate with Him, to seek Him always in a new depth, in a new discovery, in a new love. This impulse of Humanity toward God, which has not been sufficiently reached nor sufficiently known, is the priesthood of the one who is inserted into the one and only Priest who, after the coming of the New Testament, is Christ. The Christian is endowed, therefore, with this quality, this prerogative of being able to speak to the Lord in true terms, as from child to father.


What Distinguishes the Christian

Audemus dicere: we can truly celebrate before the Lord a rite, a liturgy of common prayer, a sanctification of life even in its profane aspects, which distinguishes the Christian from the non-Christian. This people is distinct, even though it is mixed in the great tide of Humanity. It has its distinction, its unmistakable characteristic. Saint Paul defined himself segregatus, separated, distinct from the rest of Humanity, precisely because he was invested with prerogatives and functions that those do not have who lack the supreme fortune and excellence of being members of Christ.

Thus we must consider that we, who are called to be children of God, to participate in the Mystical Body of Christ, who are animated by the Holy Spirit and made temples of the presence of God, must carry out this colloquy, this dialogue, this conversation with God in religion, in liturgical worship, in private devotion, and we must extend the sense of sacredness even to profane actions. “Whether you eat or drink,” said Saint Paul, “do all for the glory of God.” And he says this repeatedly in his letters, as if to claim for the Christian the ability to infuse something new, to illumine, to sanctify even temporal, external, ephemeral, profane things.


Desacralization

We are exhorted to give to the Christian people, who are called the Church, a truly sacred sense. And by affirming this, we feel that we must restrain the wave of worldliness, desacralization, secularization, which rises, which presses, and which wants to confuse and overflow the religious sense in the secret of the heart—in exclusively private life, or even in the external manifestations of life—of all personal interiority, or even make it disappear. It is affirmed that there is no longer any reason to distinguish one person from another, that nothing exists to establish such distinction. Even more: it is claimed that one must restore to man his authenticity, his true being, which is common to all.

But the Church, and today Saint Peter, calling the Christian people to awareness of themselves, tells them that they are the chosen people, distinct, acquired by Christ, a people who must exercise a particular relationship with God, a priesthood with God. This sacralization of life today must not be erased, expelled from our customs and our life, as if it should no longer appear. We have lost religious habits, we have lost many other external manifestations of religious life. Regarding this there is much to discuss and much to concede, but it is necessary to maintain the concept, and with the concept also some sign of the sacredness of the Christian people—that is, of those who are inserted into Christ, High and Eternal Priest.

This will tell us also that we must feel a great religious fervor. Today there is a part of human studies—called sociology—that dispenses with this contact with God. On the contrary, the sociology of Saint Peter, the sociology of the Church, when studying men, highlights precisely this sacred aspect, this conversation with the Ineffable, with God, with the divine world, and this must be affirmed in the study of all human differentiations.

However heterogeneous the human race may appear, we must not forget this fundamental truth that the Lord grants us when He gives us grace: we are all brothers in the same Christ. There is no longer Jew nor Greek, nor Scythian nor barbarian, nor male nor female. We are all one in Christ; we are all sanctified; we all share in this degree of supernatural elevation that Christ has conferred on us, and Saint Peter reminds us of this; it is the sociology of the Church that we must not allow to disappear or be forgotten.


Defections

Returning to look upon that panorama to which we alluded—the great plane of human life, the whole Church—what do we see? If they ask us what the Church is today, can it be calmly confronted with the words that Peter left us as inheritance and meditation? Can we be at ease? Can we not see the Church in an ideology that forces us to some reflection, to some attitude, to some effort and virtue that becomes characteristic of the Christian?

We think again in this moment—with immense charity—of all our brothers who abandon us, of many who are fugitives and forget, of many who perhaps have never managed to become aware of the Christian vocation although they have received baptism. We would truly like to extend our hand to them and tell them that our heart is always open, that crossing the threshold is easy. We would so much like to make them share in the great and ineffable fortune of our happiness, that of being in communication with God, who takes nothing away from our temporal vision and the positive realism of the external world. Perhaps this obliges us to renunciations, to sacrifices, but while it takes something from us, it multiplies its gifts. It imposes renunciations, but it abundantly provides other riches. We are not poor; we are rich, because we have the richness of the Lord.

Now then, we would like to say to these brothers—whose tearing away we feel in the depths of our priestly soul—how present they are to us, how much—now and always, and increasingly—we love them, and how much we pray for them, and how much with this effort that pursues them and surrounds them we seek to make up for the interruption that they themselves create in our communion in Christ.


Doubt, Uncertainty, Restlessness

Then there exists another category, and we all belong to it somewhat. And I would say that this category characterizes the Church today. It is as if, through some crack, the smoke of Satan has entered the temple of God. There are doubts, uncertainty, problems, restlessness, dissatisfaction, confrontation. There is no longer trust in the Church; one trusts more in the first profane prophet—who comes to speak to us from some newspaper or some social movement—to follow him and ask him if he has the formula of true life; and, on the contrary, we do not realize that we already possess and master it.

Doubt has entered our consciences and has entered through windows that should have been open to the light: science. But science is made to give us truths that do not distance us from God but make us seek Him all the more and celebrate Him with greater intensity. On the contrary, from science has come criticism, doubt regarding everything that exists and everything we know. Scientists are those who most pensively and painfully bow their heads and end by teaching: “I don’t know, we don’t know, we cannot know.” It is true that science tells us the limits of our knowledge, but everything it gives us that is positive should be certainty, should be impetus, should be enrichment, should increase our capacity for prayer and for hymns to the Lord; and, on the contrary, behold the teaching becomes an arena of confusion, of plurality that no longer agrees, of contradictions that are sometimes absurd.

Progress is exalted only to be demolished later by the most strange and radical revolutions, to deny everything that has been conquered, to return to being primitive after having so exalted the progress of the modern world.

Also among us, the people of the Church, this state of uncertainty reigns. It was believed that after the Council, a sunny day would come for the history of the Church. On the contrary, a day of clouds has come, of tempest, of darkness, of searching, of uncertainty, and one feels fatigue in giving the joy of the faith. We preach ecumenism and we distance ourselves more and more from others. We attempt to dig chasms rather than fill them.


The Devil’s Intervention

How has all this happened? We will confide to you our thought: there has been a power, an adverse power. Let us say its name: the Devil. This mysterious being who appears in Saint Peter’s very letter—which we are commenting on—and who is alluded to so many times in the Gospel—on the lips of Christ—returns the mention of this enemy of man. We believe in something preternatural that has come into the world precisely to disturb, to suffocate the fruits of the Ecumenical Council, and to hinder the Church from breaking forth into a hymn of jubilation for having once again full awareness of herself.

Precisely for this, we would like to be able, now more than ever, to exercise the function that God entrusted to Peter: to confirm the brethren in the faith. We would like to communicate to you this charism of certainty that the Lord gives to the one who represents Him, even unworthily, on this earth. And to tell you that faith—when founded on the word of God, accepted and placed in conformity with our own human spirit—gives us a truly firm certainty. Whoever believes with simplicity and humility knows he is on the right path, feels that he has an interior witness which confirms us in our difficult ideology and consoles us in the difficult conquest of truth.

The Lord manifests Himself as light and truth to the one who accepts Him in His word, and His word does not become an obstacle to truth and to the path toward being, but becomes a rung by which we may ascend and truly be conquerors of the Lord, who comes to meet us and gives Himself today through this methodology, this path of faith, which is a foretaste and guarantee of the final vision.


Strong in the Faith

And then We see the third aspect, which we so love to contemplate: the great expanse of believing Humanity. We see a great number of humble, simple, pure, upright, strong souls, who believe, who are—as Saint Peter says at the end of his epistle—“fortes in fide” (“strong in the faith”). 1 Peter 5:9 And we would like this strength of faith, this security, this peace, to triumph over the obstacles that life—our own experience and the phenomenology of things—places before us, and that we may always be strong in the faith.

Brothers, we are not saying strange, difficult, or absurd things. We would simply like you to make the experience of an act of faith, in humility and sincerity; a psychological effort that tells ourselves to try to make a conscious act. Is it true? Is it not true? Do I accept? Do I not accept? Yes, Lord, I believe in your word; I believe in your Revelation; I believe in the One whom You have given me as Witness and Guarantee of this Your Revelation, in order to feel and experience, with the strength of faith, the foretaste of the blessed life that has been promised to us through faith.

(Chat GPT translation from the official Spanish text below)


*N.B. This most famous homily of Pope Saint Paul VI apparently has no official English translation by the Vatican, to this day! It was duly published in the original Italian and in the official Spanish translation (below) by the Vatican newspaper L'osservatore Romano in the weekly edition of 30 of June - 1 of July 1972. What is more, the Vatican website today does not provide this homily in any language! Nor does it appear in the official documents of the Vatican Acta Apostolica Sedes (AAS). This homily is listed in its chronological list of Paul VI's homilies, but what is give is a cheap summary of this masterful discourse! The Enemy has many earthly agents who censor the truth to try to remain unexposed.

__

Homilía «Ser fuertes en la fe» – San Pablo VI

Misa del 29 de junio de 1972, conmemorativa del noveno aniversario de su coronación como Papa el 30 de junio de 1963, tras ser elegido el 21 de junio de 1963.
L’Osservatore Romano, 30 de junio – 1 de julio de 1972.
(Edición española, 9 de julio de 1972, pp. 1–2)

Tenemos que agradecer a vosotros y a cuantos, ausentes de Roma, estáis presentes en espíritu, la asistencia a este rito que quiere tener una doble intención. La primera —y es suficiente— es la de honrar a los santos Pedro y Pablo, especialmente por estar en la basílica en la que nos hallamos, sobre la tumba y las reliquias del apóstol Pedro; de honrar a estos príncipes de los apóstoles y de honrar a Cristo en ellos, y de sentirnos llevados por ellos a Cristo, pues les somos deudores de esta gran herencia de la fe. Y, además, la otra intención es que no podemos ser insensibles a conmemorar el noveno aniversario de nuestra elección —como sucesor de Pedro— al Pontificado romano y, lo decimos temblando, al puesto de representante visible en la Tierra, vicario de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo.

Os lo agradecemos de corazón, también, porque esta presencia nos asegura lo que más vivo y ardoroso está en nuestros deseos: vuestra adhesión, vuestra fidelidad, vuestra comunión, vuestra unidad en la oración y en la fe, y en la constitución de esta misteriosa sociedad visible y terrenal que se llama la Iglesia, y por sentirnos aquí particularmente Iglesia, unidos en Jesucristo como en un cuerpo solo; también porque confiamos en que esta presencia significa ayuda, oración, indulgencia para quien os habla y también oración por Nos, por nuestro cargo, por la misión que el Señor Nos encomendó para el bien de la Iglesia y del mundo. Y esta oración Nos servirá verdaderamente de gran sufragio para cumplir humilde y fuertemente nuestra fatiga.

Nos sentimos autorizados a ceder la palabra al propio san Pedro y a rogarle que diga una de sus palabras entre las tantas hermosas que nos dejó en las dos epístolas canónicas que conservamos en el cuerpo de la Sagrada Escritura, y elegimos las que hablan de vosotros. San Pedro habla de la comunidad, la Iglesia naciente, en la primera carta —extraña, pero expresiva— que envió desde Roma a las iglesias de Oriente, a las iglesias de Asia Menor, dicen los exégetas informados, y que, según su costumbre, escribió no para hacer nuevas comunicaciones doctrinales —como solía hacer san Pablo—, sino para exhortar. Se siente al pastor que quiere incitar, animar y dar conciencia de lo que el pueblo cristiano es y de lo que debe hacer. En esta primera carta de san Pedro se toca, con profunda clarividencia y agudeza, toda la gama de los nuevos sentimientos que deben tener vivencia y brotar con ímpetu del corazón cristiano. Entre las muchas palabras que la carta contiene, os presentamos estas que dejamos a vuestra meditación, con un breve comentario; dice san Pedro:

«Vosotros sois una estirpe elegida, un sacerdocio real, gente santa, pueblo de su propiedad, para que proclaméis las virtudes de quien os llamó de las tinieblas a la luz maravillosa. Vosotros, que antaño no erais un pueblo, ahora sois pueblo de Dios; vosotros, que antes no fuisteis partícipes de la misericordia, ahora en cambio participáis de la misericordia del Señor». 1 Pedro 2:9-10

He aquí lo que Nos sometemos un momento a vuestra reflexión.

Sacerdocio real

Estas son palabras que han sido muy estudiadas en los últimos años, especialmente porque han sido el eje de la doctrina del Concilio en su capítulo principal, es decir, en la Constitución dogmática sobre la Iglesia, donde se describe precisamente este cuadro del pueblo de Dios.

Sí; os decimos que en este momento propio de oración, pobres como somos, el Señor nos inspira para comprender las cosas. Imaginamos tener delante de Nos, casi extendida en panorama, a toda la Santa Iglesia Católica, y la vemos —con las características que san Pedro indica— en una unidad; recogida en este principio —Cristo— para este fin: glorificarle; para este beneficio: salvarse; para esta transfiguración, casi para esta metamorfosis que está iniciada en cada uno de los que componen esta comunidad de orden sobrenatural, por el descubrimiento de la vocación en cada uno de los componentes de esta gran masa humana, de este gran mar de la Humanidad, en el que cada cual está personalmente llamado como miembro de la multitud, personalmente llamado —según dice el Apocalipsis acerca del último día— a recibir un nombre nuevo.

Si bien recuerdo, dice el Señor en el texto, que todos estamos llamados a ejercer, a componer, un sacerdocio real. Aquí hay una reminiscencia del Antiguo Testamento —la del Éxodo— cuando Dios, hablando a Moisés antes de entregarle la Ley, dice: «Yo haré de este pueblo un pueblo sacerdotal y real». San Pedro recoge esta palabra tan grande, tan exaltadora, y la aplica al nuevo pueblo de Dios, heredero y continuador del Israel de la Biblia, para formar un nuevo Israel, el Israel de Cristo. Dice san Pedro: «Será el pueblo sacerdotal y real el que glorificará al Dios de la misericordia, al Dios de la salvación».

Sabemos que esta palabra ha sido, a veces, mal entendida, como si el sacerdocio fuera un solo orden, es decir, fuese comunicado a cuantos están insertos en el Cuerpo Místico de Cristo, a cuantos son cristianos. En cierto sentido es verdad, y solemos llamarlo sacerdocio común, pero el Concilio nos dice —y la Tradición ya nos lo había enseñado— que existe otro grado, otro estado de sacerdocio: el sacerdocio ministerial, que tiene facultades y prerrogativas particulares y exclusivas, precisamente del sacerdocio ministerial.

Pero detengámonos en lo que interesa a todos: el sacerdocio real. Aquí deberíamos preguntarnos qué significa sacerdocio, pero las explicaciones no acabarían nunca, y por ello nos limitamos y conformamos con esto: sacerdote significa capacidad de rendir culto a Dios, de comunicar con Él, de buscarle siempre en una profundidad nueva, en un descubrimiento nuevo, en un amor nuevo. Este impulso de la Humanidad hacia Dios, que no ha sido suficientemente alcanzado ni suficientemente conocido, es el sacerdocio de quien está inserto en el único Sacerdote que, después del advenimiento del Nuevo Testamento, es Cristo. Es que el cristiano está dotado, por ello mismo, de esta calidad, de esta prerrogativa de poder hablar al Señor en términos verdaderos, como de hijo a padre.

Lo que distingue al cristiano

Audemus dicere: podemos en verdad celebrar ante el Señor un rito, una liturgia de la oración común, una santificación de la vida incluso profana, que distingue al cristiano del que no es cristiano. Este pueblo es distinto, aunque esté confundido en la gran marea de la Humanidad. Tiene su distinción, su característica inconfundible. San Pablo se definió segregatus, separado, distinto del resto de la Humanidad, precisamente por estar investido de prerrogativas y funciones que no tienen los que no poseen la suma fortuna y la excelencia de ser miembros de Cristo.

Entonces tenemos que considerar que nosotros, los que estamos llamados a ser hijos de Dios, a participar en el Cuerpo Místico de Cristo, que somos animados por el Espíritu Santo y hechos templos de la presencia de Dios, tenemos que realizar este coloquio, este diálogo, esta conversación con Dios en la religión, en el culto litúrgico, en el culto privado, y tenemos que extender el sentido de la sacralidad incluso a las acciones profanas. «Si coméis, si bebéis —dijo san Pablo—, hacedlo por la gloria de Dios.» Y lo dice repetidas veces en sus cartas, como para reivindicar al cristiano la capacidad de infundir algo nuevo, de iluminar, de sacralizar también las cosas temporales, externas, efímeras, profanas.

Desacralización

Se nos exhorta a dar al pueblo cristiano, que se llama Iglesia, un sentido verdaderamente sagrado. Y afirmándolo así, sentirnos que tenemos que contener la ola de profanidad, desacralización, secularización, que sube, que oprime y que quiere confundir y desbordar el sentido religioso en el secreto del corazón —en la vida privada exclusivamente secreta, o también en las afirmaciones de la vida exterior— de toda interioridad personal, o incluso hacerlo desaparecer. Se afirma que ya no hay razón para distinguir un hombre de otro, que no hay nada que pueda realizar esta distinción. Aún más: hay que devolver al hombre su autenticidad, hay que devolver al hombre su verdadero ser, que es común a todos los demás.

Pero la Iglesia, y hoy san Pedro, llamando al pueblo cristiano a la conciencia de sí mismo, le dicen que es el pueblo elegido, distinto, adquirido por Cristo, un pueblo que debe ejercer una particular relación con Dios, un sacerdocio con Dios. Esta sacralización de la vida hoy no debe ser borrada, expulsada de las costumbres y de nuestra vida, como si ya no debiera figurar. Hemos perdido los hábitos religiosos, hemos perdido muchas otras manifestaciones exteriores de la vida religiosa. Respecto a esto hay mucho que discutir y mucho que conceder, pero es necesario mantener el concepto, y con el concepto también algún signo de la sacralidad del pueblo cristiano, es decir, de aquellos que están insertos en Cristo, Sumo y Eterno Sacerdote.

Ello nos dirá también que tenemos que sentir un gran fervor religioso. En la actualidad hay una parte de los estudios de la Humanidad —la llamada sociología— que prescinde de este contacto con Dios. Por el contrario, la sociología de san Pedro, la sociología de la Iglesia, al estudiar a los hombres, pone en evidencia precisamente este aspecto sacral, de conversación con el Inefable, con Dios, con el mundo divino, y ello hay que afirmarlo en el estudio de todas las diferenciaciones humanas.

Por muy heterogéneo que se presente el género humano, no tenemos que olvidar esta verdad fundamental que el Señor nos confiere cuando nos da la gracia: todos somos hermanos en el mismo Cristo. Ya no hay ni judío, ni griego, ni escita, ni bárbaro, ni hombre, ni mujer. Todos somos una sola cosa en Cristo, todos estamos santificados, todos tenemos la participación en este grado de elevación sobrenatural que Cristo nos confirió, y san Pedro nos lo recuerda; es la sociología de la Iglesia que no debemos hacer desaparecer ni olvidar.

Defecciones

Volviendo a mirar aquel panorama a que aludimos —el gran plano de la vida humana, toda la Iglesia—, ¿qué es lo que vemos? Si nos preguntan qué es hoy la Iglesia, ¿se puede confrontar tranquilamente con las palabras que Pedro nos dejó como herencia y meditación?, ¿podemos estar tranquilos? ¿No podemos ver a la Iglesia en una ideología que nos obliga a alguna reflexión, a alguna actitud, a algún esfuerzo y a alguna virtud que se convierte en característica del cristiano?

Pensamos de nuevo en este momento —con inmensa caridad— en todos nuestros hermanos que nos abandonan, en muchos que son fugitivos y olvidan, en muchos que tal vez nunca han conseguido tener conciencia de la vocación cristiana aunque han recibido el bautismo. Quisiéramos muy de verdad tender la mano hacia ellos y decirles que el corazón está siempre abierto, que pasar el umbral es fácil. Mucho quisiéramos hacerles partícipes de la grande e inefable fortuna de nuestra felicidad, la de estar en comunicación con Dios, que no nos quita nada de la visión temporal y del realismo positivo del mundo exterior. Tal vez ello nos obliga a renuncias, a sacrificios, pero mientras nos priva de algo, multiplica sus dones. Nos impone renuncias, pero nos proporciona abundantemente otras riquezas. No somos pobres, somos ricos, porque tenemos la riqueza del Señor.

Ahora bien, quisiéramos decir a estos hermanos —de los que sentimos el desgarro en las entrañas de nuestra alma sacerdotal— cuánto les tenemos presente, cuánto —ahora y siempre, y cada vez más— les queremos, y cuánto rezamos por ellos, y cuánto procuramos con este esfuerzo que les persigue y les rodea suplir la interrupción que ellos mismos hacen de nuestra comunión en Cristo.
Duda, incertidumbre, inquietud

Luego existe otra categoría, y a ella pertenecemos un poco todos. Y diría que esta categoría caracteriza a la Iglesia de hoy. Se diría que a través de alguna grieta ha entrado el humo de Satanás en el templo de Dios. Hay dudas, incertidumbre, problemática, inquietud, insatisfacción, confrontación. Ya no se confía en la Iglesia; se confía más en el primer profeta profano —que nos viene a hablar desde algún periódico o desde algún movimiento social— para seguirle y preguntarle si tiene la fórmula de la verdadera vida; y, por el contrario, no nos damos cuenta de que nosotros ya somos dueños y maestros de ella.

Ha entrado la duda en nuestras conciencias y ha entrado a través de ventanas que debían estar abiertas a la luz: la ciencia. Pero la ciencia está hecha para darnos verdades que no alejan de Dios, sino que nos lo hacen buscar aún más y celebrarle con mayor intensidad. Por el contrario, de la ciencia ha venido la crítica, ha venido la duda respecto a todo lo que existe y a todo lo que conocemos. Los científicos son aquellos que más pensativa y dolorosamente bajan la frente y acaban por enseñar: «no sé, no sabemos, no podemos saber». Es cierto que la ciencia nos dice los límites de nuestro saber, pero todo lo que nos proporciona de positivo debería ser certeza, debería ser impulso, debería ser riqueza, debería aumentar nuestra capacidad de oración y de himno al Señor; y, por el contrario, he aquí que la enseñanza se convierte en palestra de confusión, en pluralidad que ya no va de acuerdo, en contradicciones a veces absurdas.

Se ensalza el progreso para luego poder demolerlo con las revoluciones más extrañas y radicales, para negar todo lo que se ha conquistado, para volver a ser primitivos después de haber exaltado tanto los progresos del mundo moderno.

También en nosotros, los de la Iglesia, reina este estado de incertidumbre. Se creía que después del Concilio vendría un día de sol para la historia de la Iglesia. Por el contrario, ha venido un día de nubes, de tempestad, de oscuridad, de búsqueda, de incertidumbre, y se siente fatiga en dar la alegría de la fe. Predicamos el ecumenismo y nos alejamos cada vez más de los otros. Procuramos excavar abismos en vez de colmarlos.

Intervención del Diablo

¿Cómo ha ocurrido todo esto? Nos os confiaremos nuestro pensamiento: ha habido un poder, un poder adverso. Digamos su nombre: el Demonio. Este misterioso ser que está en la propia carta de san Pedro —que estamos comentando— y al que se hace alusión tantas y cuantas veces en el Evangelio —en los labios de Cristo— vuelve la mención de este enemigo del hombre. Creemos en algo preternatural venido al mundo precisamente para perturbar, para sofocar los frutos del Concilio Ecuménico y para impedir que la Iglesia prorrumpiera en el himno de júbilo por tener de nuevo plena conciencia de sí misma.

Precisamente por esto, quisiéramos ser capaces, ahora más que nunca, de ejercer la función que Dios encomendó a Pedro de confirmar en la fe a los hermanos. Quisiéramos comunicarnos este carisma de la certeza que el Señor da a quien le representa, incluso indignamente, en esta tierra. Y deciros que la fe —cuando está fundada en la palabra de Dios, aceptada y situada en la conformidad de nuestro propio ánimo humano— nos da una certeza verdaderamente segura. Quien crea con sencillez, con humildad, se sabe por el buen camino, siente que tiene un testimonio interior que nos confirma en nuestra difícil ideología y nos conforta en la difícil conquista de la verdad.

El Señor se manifiesta como luz y verdad al que lo acepta en su palabra, y su palabra no se convierte en obstáculo a la verdad y al camino hacia el ser, sino en peldaño por el que podemos subir y ser de verdad conquistadores del Señor, que nos viene al encuentro y se entrega hoy a través de esta metodología, de este camino de la fe que es anticipo y garantía de la visión definitiva.

Fuertes en la fe

Y entonces Nos vemos el tercer aspecto, que nos gusta tanto contemplar, la gran extensión de la Humanidad creyente. Vemos una gran cantidad de almas humildes, simples, puras, rectas, fuertes, que creen, que son —según dice san Pedro al final de su epístola— «fortes in fide». 1 Pedro 5:9 Y quisiéramos que esta fuerza de la fe, esta seguridad, esta paz, triunfase sobre los obstáculos que la vida —nuestra propia experiencia y la fenomenología de las cosas— ponen delante de nosotros, y que fuéramos siempre fuertes en la fe.

Hermanos, no decimos cosas extrañas, difíciles ni absurdas. Quisiéramos tan solo que hicierais la experiencia de un acto de fe, en humildad y sinceridad; un esfuerzo psicológico que nos diga a nosotros mismos que tratemos de cumplir una acción consciente. ¿Es cierto?, ¿no es cierto? ¿Acepto?, ¿no acepto? Sí, Señor, yo creo en tu palabra; creo en tu Revelación; creo en quien Tú me has dado como testigo y garantía de esta Revelación Tuya, para sentir y probar, con la fuerza de la fe, el anticipo de la bienaventuranza de la vida que con la fe se nos ha prometido.

President Trump's Immaculate Conception Message

Presidential Message on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception


Today, I recognize every American celebrating December 8 as a Holy Day honoring the faith, humility, and love of Mary, mother of Jesus and one of the greatest figures in the Bible.

On the Feast of the Immaculate Conception, Catholics celebrate what they believe to be Mary’s freedom from original sin as the mother of God.  She first entered recorded history as a young woman when, according to Holy Scripture, the Angel Gabriel greeted her in the village of Nazareth with news of a miracle: “Hail, favored one!  The Lord is with you,” announcing that “you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus.”

In one of the most profound and consequential acts of history, Mary heroically accepted God’s will with trust and humility:  “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord.  May it be done to me according to your word.”  Mary’s decision forever altered the course of humanity.  Nine months later, God became man when Mary gave birth to a son, Jesus, who would go on to offer his life on the Cross for the redemption of sins and the salvation of the world.

For nearly 250 years, Mary has played a distinct role in our great American story.  In 1792, less than a decade after the end of the Revolutionary War, Bishop John Carroll—the first Catholic bishop in the United States and cousin of signer of the Declaration of Independence Charles Carroll—consecrated our young Nation to the mother of Christ.  Less than a quarter-century later, Catholics attributed General Andrew Jackson’s stunning victory over the British in the climactic Battle of New Orleans to Mary.  Every year, Catholics celebrate a Mass of Thanksgiving in New Orleans on January 8 in memory of Mary’s assistance in saving the city.

Over the ages, American legends like Elizabeth Ann Seton, Frances Xavier Cabrini, and Fulton Sheen, who spent their lives glorifying God in service to others, have held a deep devotion to Mary.  The Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, located in the heart of our Nation’s Capital, honors Mary as the largest church in North America.  The timeless hymn “Ave Maria” remains beloved by countless citizens.  She has inspired the establishment of countless churches, hospitals, and schools.  Nearly 50 American colleges and universities bear Mary’s name.  And, just days from now, on December 12, Catholics in the United States and Mexico will celebrate the steadfast devotion to Mary that originated in the heart of Mexico—a place now home to the beautiful Basilica of Our Lady of Guadalupe—in 1531.  As we approach 250 years of glorious American Independence, we acknowledge and give thanks, with total gratitude, for Mary’s role in advancing peace, hope, and love in America and beyond our shores.

More than a century ago, in the midst of World War I, Pope Benedict XV, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church, commissioned and dedicated a majestic statue of Mary, Queen of Peace, bearing the infant Christ with an olive branch so that the Christian faithful would be encouraged to look to her example of peace by praying for a stop to the horrific slaughter.  Just a few months later, World War I ended.  Today, we look to Mary once again for inspiration and encouragement as we pray for an end to war and for a new and lasting era of peace, prosperity, and harmony in Europe and throughout the world.

In her honor, and on a day so special to our Catholic citizens, we remember the sacred words that have brought aid, comfort, and support to generations of American believers in times of need:

Hail, Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with thee.  Blessed art thou among women and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus.  Holy Mary, Mother of God, pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death.  Amen.

Cardinal Vincent Nichols Interview

"I chose this way [the way of celibate chastity] because of the example of other priests...[I saw that] they were happy."

Regarding suicide and abortion: "What we need for dying is care, not killing."

"We have systems in place that help to create a culture of safeguarding."

Plinthos: Yes, now the bishops treat all priests as criminals with required on-going training sessions for all innocent priests, and, in the US, the red-tape of redundant "Letters of Suitability," just to say Mass when a priest visits a church in another diocese! The hierarchy abuses the priests in response to the own negligence!

"But, forgiveness does not guarantee no future offences."

"The English monarch was the 'Provider and Protector' of Saint Paul's Outside the Walls."

Given the newfound mutual respect between the English Monarchy and the Vatican, "There is great hope for the role of religion in society."

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Ambassador Eduard Habsburg's Farewell to Vatican Post


"A large family is the greatest thing a married couple can give to each other, it is the greatest thing they can give to their children, it is the greatest thing they can give to the State in which they live."

"Growing up in Germany in the 1980's was not the ideal nurturing ground for faith."

--Amassador Eduard Habsburg

Friday, December 5, 2025

Immaculate Conception Sermon Notes --Newman


1851

1. INTROD.—The world always the same, and its history the same. It is always sinning, always going on to punishment. Judgments and visitations {94} always [coming] upon it. Christ always coming [in judgment].

Sin provoking wrath.

2. This is seen in the judgments on cities for their crimes—Nineveh, Babylon, etc., and above all, Sodom and Gomorrah—all figures of the end of the world.

3. And especially eras—the deluge—the Christian era [Note 14]—the end of the world. And they are compared together in Scripture, Matt. xxiv., etc.

4. What sin (provoking wrath)? Sensuality.

As the loss of vital powers brings on dissolution of [the] body, so when passion emancipates itself from conscience, the death of the world.

5. The truth is, that the flesh is so strong, it is always struggling against conscience. It is like a wild beast in a cage, ever trying to get out, and but slowly subdued. Heavy things fall; steam rises up. So with concupiscence; and hence St. Peter [speaks of] 'The corruption of that concupiscence which is in the world,' 2 Peter i. 4.

6. Now as this goes on in a state, reason becomes infidel and the conscience goes, and then there is nothing to restrain concupiscence.

7. Hence we are sure (exceptis excipiendis) that wherever there is not religion there is immorality. What is to keep a man from indulgence?

8. Statesmen see this so well that they advocate religion.

9. Hence [came the] deluge—[the] Christian era [Note 15]. {95} [hence will come the] end of the world, [i.e. when] infidelity [has] brought in sensuality.

10. This age [is] an impure age.

11. Hence [the] B[lessed] V[irgin] M[ary] [is] attacked.

12. Hence [the devotion to] the Immaculate Conception is so apposite.

Thursday, December 4, 2025

Anti-Catholic Ideologies: The Sons of Judah


Judaism*

Islamism

Protestantism

Enlightenment Rationalism/Secularism

Communism

__

All of these present day ideologies have been violently opposed to Catholic/Orthodox aristocratic society, the Christian ordering of society under the watchful care of the Christ-instituted apostolic succession, with the consequent Catholic/Christian realms and aristocracies. They all are ideologically opposed to Christendom and the reign of Christ in the world, in His Church, the Catholic Church. The progenitor of this transhistorical anti-Christ is Judaism, which actually killed Christ, and which, to some degree, has spawned and, at least encourages them all, to our own day.

Notice, for example, that the outcome of communism is the destruction of Catholic aristocracies. It is a curious fact that communism, that Jewish/English invention has never been imposed on any possessions of the English Commonwealth nor on any Muslim country. It is almost exclusively used to destroy erstwhile prosperous Catholic countries like Cuba and Venezuela, etc. This ideological alliance solves that great modern political puzzle.

__
John Chapter 11

47 The chief priests therefore, and the Pharisees, gathered a council, and said: What do we, for this man doth many miracles?

48 If we let him alone so, all will believe in him; and the Romans will come, and take away our place and nation.

49 But one of them, named Caiphas, being the high priest that year, said to them: You know nothing.

50 Neither do you consider that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.

51 And this he spoke not of himself: but being the high priest of that year, he prophesied that Jesus should die for the nation.

52 And not only for the nation, but to gather together in one the children of God, that were dispersed.

53 From that day therefore they devised to put him to death.

Jews Conspire With Roman Soldiers Concocting the Body Snatching Myth Against Christians


__

The Prophesy to Judah is Fulfilled in Christ, the true King David of the Tribe of Judah

The Prophesy

Genesis 49

8 Juda, thee shall thy brethren praise: thy hands shall be on the necks of thy enemies: the sons of thy father shall bow down to thee.

9 Juda is a lion's whelp: to the prey, my son, thou art gone up: resting thou hast couched as a lion, and as a lioness, who shall rouse him?

10 The sceptre shall not be taken away from Juda, nor a ruler from his thigh, till he come that is to be sent, and he shall be the expectation of nations.

11 Tying his foal to the vineyard, and his ass, O my son, to the vine. He shall wash his robe in wine, and his garment in the blood of the grape.

12 His eyes are more beautiful than wine, and his teeth whiter than milk.

The Fulfillment

Apocalypse Chapter 5

5 And one of the ancients said to me: Weep not; behold the lion of the tribe of Juda, the root of David, hath prevailed to open the book, and to loose the seven seals thereof.

6 And I saw: and behold in the midst of the throne and of the four living creatures, and in the midst of the ancients, a Lamb standing as it were slain, having seven horns and seven eyes: which are the seven Spirits of God, sent forth into all the earth.

7 And he came and took the book out of the right hand of him that sat on the throne.

8 And when he had opened the book, the four living creatures, and the four and twenty ancients fell down before the Lamb, having every one of them harps, and golden vials full of odours, which are the prayers of saints:

9 And they sung a new canticle, saying: Thou art worthy, O Lord, to take the book, and to open the seals thereof; because thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God, in thy blood, out of every tribe, and tongue, and people, and nation.

10 And hast made us to our God a kingdom and priests, and we shall reign on the earth.

11 And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round about the throne, and the living creatures, and the ancients; and the number of them was thousands of thousands,

12 Saying with a loud voice: The Lamb that was slain is worthy to receive power, and divinity, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and benediction.

13 And every creature, which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them: I heard all saying: To him that sitteth on the throne, and to the Lamb, benediction, and honour, and glory, and power, for ever and ever.

14 And the four living creatures said: Amen. And the four and twenty ancients fell down on their faces, and adored him that liveth for ever and ever.

Jesus Christ is the King of the Jews, Who Reigns Forever and Ever, Woe to Those Who Oppose Him or in any way Attempt to Destroy Him or His Reign! All men need to convert and come to the knowledge and love of Christ the Lord!

*Judaism here is referenced as an ideology which rejects Jesus Christ, that He is the Son of God, that He is God. It does not mean all the Jews or, even less, all the Semites. Jesus Christ Himself, His Mother Mary and most of the Apostles are ethnic Jews. Cf. E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, Fidelity Press: South Bend, Indiana, 2015, pp. 1031ff.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...