Friday, January 9, 2015

The First Thanksgiving in America Was With Holy Mass!


The Oldest Church in America, 1610

"Eucharist" means good grace or "graces"
("gracias" in Spanish)
of which the English expression
"thanks"
is
a translation!
Hence "Thanksgiving."

The first Thanksgiving feast took place in present day El Paso, Texas on April 30, 1598.

It was organized by the expedition of Don Juan de Oñate.

A giant 34 feet tall bronze statute of the Spanish expedition leader and conquistador, Don Juan de Oñate, was unveiled during a ceremony on April 21, 2007 at the front entrance of the El Paso International Airport.









N.B. The history of Santa Fe, New Mexico (Full and original name being La Villa Real de la Santa Fe de San Francisco de Asís (“The Royal Town of the Holy Faith of St. Francis of Assisi”). He established the city of Santa Fe, New Mexico as the capital of the new Santa Fe province of New Spain. Above, San Miguel, is the church which was built there, the oldest standing church in America.


"El Camino Real de los Tejas"
King's Highway


The First Thanksgivings Were Catholic

Marian T. Horvat, Ph.D.

I have been asked to comment on Thanksgiving, the national holiday commemorating the first successful harvest season of the grim Protestant pilgrims of New England.

“It just doesn’t seem right to celebrate the prospering of a Puritan sect that established a Calvinist theocracy in the Massachusetts Colony that would mercilessly persecute Catholics,” one reader argued.

Such Catholics, gathered around their laden Thanksgiving tables enjoying the company of family and friends, should know a quite consoling fact of American History: the first Thanksgivings on U.S. soil were Catholic.

Conquistador

The epic journey of the first European colonists to the Southwest
The American History books we studied as youth pretend that Colonial American History is exclusively what happened in the thirteen New England colonies. This ignores an enormous part of reality - our Catholic History. Little attention is paid to the epic northward advance by Spanish pioneers into the southern tier of States reaching from Florida across Texas and New Mexico to California, today called the Spanish Borderlands.

The first two Thanksgivings in the present day United States were actually Catholic. The Pilgrims can only claim a third one, a correction I suggest should be made in school history books.

The first Thanksgivings were celebrated by Spanish explorers, not pilgrims. It is Florida that today proudly claims the first Thanksgiving, with a feast and celebration between the Spanish and Timucuan Indians on September 8, 1565, 56 years before the Mayflower landed at Plymouth in 1621. Therefore, St. Augustine - and not Jamestown - is the first permanent European settlement and oldest city in North America. Another correction for many history books.

The second Thanksgiving, the subject of this article, was in Texas. On January 26, 1598, a Spanish expedition set out from Mexico with the aim of founding a new kingdom. Three months later, after a long, dangerous trek forging a new trail northward, the now famous El Camino Real [The Royal Road], it crossed the Rio Grande and set up camp south of present day El Paso, Texas. On April 30, a Mass of thanksgiving was said, and the valiant leader of the expedition, Don Juan de Oñate, took formal possession of the new land, called New Mexico, in the name of the Heavenly Lord, God Almighty, and the earthly lord King Philip II.

Then, after the Mass, the Franciscan priests blessed the food on tables abundant with fish, ducks and geese, and the 600-strong expedition of soldiers and colonists feasted. The celebration ended with a play enacting scenes of the native Indians hearing the first words of the Catholic Faith and receiving the Sacrament of Baptism.

If the New Spain colonies had not set aside their Catholic heritage, perhaps today Florida would be celebrating its Thanksgiving day on September 8, while Texas would have its own special feast on April 30. This would be more in keeping with the healthy spirit of regionalism which characterizes organic society.

Who was Don Juan de Oñate?

Don Juan de Oñate, the Basque leader of the New Mexico expedition, should become a name as familiar as Plymouth founder Captain John Smith or Puritan Governor William Bradford. His exploits, deeds, and spirit are of the sort that inspired the medieval sagas, or today, the epic film.

Don Juan Onate

Don Juan de Oñate
Juan de Oñate was from a noble Basque Spanish family that had become wealthy in the New World in silver mining. As a young man, Don Juan had led campaigns at his own expense in service to the Crown to pacify Indians near the northern outposts of Mexico. In his late 30s, he married Isabel de Tolosa, the granddaughter of the conquistador Fernando Cortes and Isabel Montezuma, the offspring of the late Aztec emperor.

In 1595, Oñate was chosen by King Philip II to colonize and explore the provinces of the proposed kingdom of New Mexico. The terms of the arrangement sound quite unusual to modern ears. Don Oñate agreed to equip and arm at his personal expense 200 men to serve as soldiers, as well as provide for their families and servants, to a total of 500-600 persons. He had to purchase sufficient food, clothing and supplies for the trek north, as well as during the period of building the first houses. He also pledged to bring mining and blacksmithing tools, medicine, Indian trade goods, seeds, plows, and all the other necessities.

In short, he completely subsidized the expenses of a dangerous, uncertain expedition that could easily end in failure.

Why did he bother to undertake such a venture? He already had a position of prestige and power in New Spain; he was wealthy, with the potential to become even richer in silver mining had he remained where he was. Instead, he contracted to take on the momentous expenses of equipping and maintaining an expedition of some 600 people and set out on an uncertain, dangerous, and difficult march into an unknown, hostile terrain.

Missionaries and soldiers, El Paso

Priests and friars were present on every colonial Spanish expedition at the expense of the Crown
Why did he go? He went for the adventure, to undertake a grand enterprise first, for the glory of God and King, and second, for his personal prestige.

First, from his detailed record book, it is clear that Don Oñate went for God; his notes show a true desire to expand the boundaries of the religion of Our Lord Jesus Christ. He marched under a personal standard of white silk stamped on one side with pictures of Our Lady and St. John the Baptist, Oñate’s patron saint; on the reverse side was St. James on horseback carrying a sword.

The Spanish monarchy made the defense and propagation of the Catholic Faith the supreme aim of the State. In the instructions given to Oñate, the Crown clearly stated the primary goal of the expedition was to initiate conversion of the “many large settlements of heathen Indians who live in ignorance of God and our Holy Catholic Faith … so that they might have an orderly and decent Christian life.”

Only one expense of the expedition did the Crown assume: The King provided thePatronato Real, the Royal Patronage, agreeing to pay the expenses of the 10 priests and friars, who accompanied the group both to minister to the men and convert natives. It is a clear demonstration of the great importance the Crown gave to the missionary effort.

Juan Onate statue

Oñate sets forth under authority of Cross & Crown
Statue by by Reynaldo Rivera
Second, Oñate went for his prestige. In return for bearing the expenses of the expedition, he was promised the title of Governor, as well as the supreme military rank of Captain-General with civil and criminal jurisdiction over the Kingdom of New Mexico. These titles were granted for life with privilege of passing them on to his heirs. The Crown also agreed to award all Oñate’s men by making them nobles, hidalgos, after five years residence in New Mexico.

So, Don Oñate and his expedition went forth in January of 1598, under the symbol of the Cross and the authority of the Crown. It has been said that the Middle Ages drew its last breath in these captains and conquistadors of the New World. I think that it is very true.

Certainly, the aims, spirit, attitudes and religion of the Spanish explorers could not have been more different from those of the Puritans who, motivated by self-interest, landed at Plymouth Rock to make a small, comfortable life for themselves and their families, with no thought of the spiritual welfare of the Indians, no dreams of heroism, glory or fame. This clear difference in spirit and mentality makes the colonial Catholic Spaniards a better model for Americans than the Puritans.

The expedition through the desert

After three long years of extremely costly delays, Don Oñate, age 43, set out from Santa Barbara, the most northern Spanish outpost in Mexico, on January 26, 1598. He aimed to establish a short, direct route due northward through 200 miles of Chihuahuan desert, a trail would later become part of the famous El Camino Real. The sprawling train he led was reported to spread out for three miles in length. It was a formidable sight: some 500-600 men, 175 of them soldiers, many of them in armor, 83 ox-carts, 26 wagons and carriages, and over 7,000 head of livestock.

Camino Real, map

In January 1598 the expedition left the last Spanish outpost of Santa Barbara & headed north to the Rio Grande. Above, El Camino Real
The first significant obstacle Don Oñate faced was not the desert, but the unseasonable high waters of the Conchos River, making a crossing appear impossible. Don Oñate refused to halt or turn back. Instead, he made a rallying call:

“Come, noble soldiers, knights of Christ, here is presented the first opportunity for you to show your mettle and courage to prove that you are deserving of the glories in store for you.”

Then he ordered up his horse and without pause plunged into the foaming torrent and reached shore. His exploit set the example, and the crossing was made. Only the sheep were left behind on the south bank, unable to swim because the weight of their wool when soaked with water would pull them under. Don Juan ordered the wooden wheels removed from the carts, anchored them in pairs to rafts, and strung them in a line over the water. The bleating sheep crossed the Conchos on them, and the expedition continued.

By early March, Oñate’s expedition had reached the treacherous Chihuahuan Desert. Some days into the desert journey, they were desperately in need of water. Unexpectedly, they came to a small stream, which they named the Rio Sacramentobecause it was found on Holy Thursday, the feast of the institution of the Blessed Sacrament.

The next day, Don Oñate ordered a halt and a temporary chapel was erected for Easter Mass. They named the site Encinar de la Resurrección, Place of the Resurrection. The men passed the night in penance and prayer; Don Oñate also bared his back to take the discipline in atonement of sins, a common practice among the Spanish faithful during Holy Week.

The long march continued, and water grew scarcer. On April 1, after a night long vigil of prayer, Don Oñate made this entry in his log book: “God succored us with a downpour so heavy that very large pools formed …. Therefore, we name this placeSocorro del Cielo [Aid from Heaven].”

Catholic Colonists

Colonists on El Camino Real
This was how the journey progressed. At every crucial moment, an aid from Heaven came. For the soldiers and colonists, those aids were miracles from God who was blessing their venture. To pay Him some small thanks, they gave the streams that they found, the sites where they rested, holy names that glorified God and His Saints.

Finally, on April 21, 1598, the exhausted expedition reached the banks of the Rio Grande. For the last five days of the march, the expedition had run out of both food and water, and the colonists had suffered a mind-numbing thirst. Don Oñate, seeing the extreme fatigue on the faces of the people, proclaimed a week’s rest on the river bank as scouts searched for a suitable place to ford the river and cross into New Mexico, what is the present-day El Paso, Texas.

Taking possession and the first Thanksgiving

Oñate ordered a temporary church to be constructed with a nave large enough to hold the entire camp. Under those boughs, on April 30, 1598, the feast day of the Ascension of Our Lord, the Te Deum was sung and the Franciscans celebrated a solemn high Mass, the first Thanksgiving celebration in our lands.

The moment had arrived for La Toma, the formal ceremony of taking possession of new land, a ritual that was both secular and religious in nature. It was a triumphant moment for Don Oñate and his Spanish priests, soldiers and colonists who had suffered much and seen their expedition often at the point of perishing. The Army drew up in formation on horseback, each man in polished armor. Don Oñate stepped forward to read the official proclamation:

“In the name of the most Holy Trinity … I take possession of this whole land this April 30, 1598, in honor of Our Lord Jesus Christ, on this day of the Ascension of Our Lord ….”
Reenactment of thanksgiving, El Paso

Each year El Paso re-enacts the Oñate expedition’s first Thanksgiving
To the fanfare of trumpets and volleys of musket shots, Oñate signed and sealed the official act with a flourish, and the Holy Cross and the royal standard were both raised in the camp, completing the legal requirements of La Toma. With that, the kingdom of New Mexico came into being, at midday on April 30, 1598.

The colonists went on to celebrate the first Thanksgiving with a grand feast of fish, “many cranes, ducks and geese.” The rest of the day passed with song, foot races, and other competitive games. In the evening, all enjoyed a play, written by one of Oñate’s captains, Marcos Farfan, which enacted happy scenes of the Franciscan missionaries entering the country, the Indians kneeling to receive them and asking to be received into the Holy Faith.

This is the description of that glorious festivity which represents, I am convinced, the plan of God for those lands that today comprise our country.

Since the last Thursday of November is a random date to commemorate Thanksgiving, I propose that Catholics in Texas commemorate on this day the conquest of Don Oñate and the Franciscan priests, rather than that bitter harvest of the Puritans. I am sure that this will glorify Our Lord Jesus Christ and gain his blessing for our future.


The content of this article is based upon these sources:
1. Adams, Don and Kendrick, Teresa A., Don Juan de Oñate and the First Thanksgiving,
http://historicaltextarchive.com/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=736
2. Mattox, Jake, ed., Explorers of the New World, Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press, 2004.
3. Simmons, Marc, The Last Conquistador: Juan de Oñate and the Settling of the Far Southwest. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
Posted by Traditionainaction November 22, 2006

Fight for Holy Monogamy!

Spousal, Heterosexual, Holy
It's God's

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Victory of Faith


Looking at the first reading for today's Mass I came across the traditional Greek word for Christ: NIKA! (Victor!)

Christus vincit!
Christus regnat!
Christus imperat!

What also comes to mind are the words of Christ to the first Christian Emperor Constantine the Great: by this sign you will conquer. It's the verb form of the same word.

To go from the sublime to the banal, Nike is therefore a Christian symbol! Go figure!

Tomorrow's reading begins thus:

"Who indeed is the victor over the world but the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?" 1 John 5:5

Confessions of a Light Drinker


With Drink, as with the Mass, the Norm is No Bination!

You should apply the rule for priests saying Mass.

+ Limit one a day.

+ No daily planned bination (two only by way of rare, unforeseen exception; and mention it to your confessor).

+ No trination (three only by way of the very rarest exception; and perhaps you need to confess it).

+ Never four! (absolutely never more than three in one day: that you must confess).

The norm is ONE!

Unlike with the Mass, it is highly recommended by the Church that the priest celebrate every day. One need not do that with drink, though it is recommended by health experts. But one must first save one's soul! The Christian goal is sanctity!, not just moderation.

Stick to one drink or less! Lately my friends and I will take half a glass of wine with dinner! Learn to do with less! Practice doing without.

You see, if you habitually take more than one drink a day, you will soon begin to need daily drink (even if it is just with meals)! You will create a chemical dependency. You will get "hooked!" You should never need anything daily, besides Jesus. That is at least the beginning of a problem. Then you should go cold turkey for a while,...or for life, if necessary! Nothing outside of Mass, and very little there.

No joke!

Drinking more than one drink in a day for your health is...
...like going to a prostitute for a hug.

Wine can no longer make my heart glad; a little of it makes me sad, much makes melancholy. My soul is faint and impotent; in vain I prick the spur of pleasure into its flank, its strength is gone, it rises no more the royal leap. I have lost my illusions. Vainly I seek to plunge myself into the boundless sea of joy; it cannot sustain me, or rather, I cannot sustain myself. Once pleasure had but to beckon me, and I rose, light of foot, sound and unafraid. When I rode slowly through the woods, it was as if I flew; now when the horse is covered with lather and ready to drop, it seems to me that I do not move. I am solitary as always; forsaken, not by men, which could not hurt me, but by the happy fairies of joy, who used to encircle me in countless multitudes, who met acquaintances everywhere, everywhere showed me an opportunity for pleasure. As an intoxicated man gathers a wild crowd of youths about him, so they flocked about me, the fairies of joy, and I greeted them with a smile. My soul has lost its potentiality. If I were to wish for anything, I should not wish for wealth and power, but for the passionate sense of the potential, for the eye which, ever young and ardent, sees the possible. Pleasure disappoints, possibility never. And what wine is so foaming, what so fragrant, what so intoxicating, as possibility.

Kierkegaard Either/Or (Vol. I; DIAPSALMATA: AD SE IPSUM)
A Kierkegaard Anthology, ed. Robert Bretall Random House, New York, 1946, pp. 34-35

The Charlie Hebdo Slaughter: Obscene Blasphemy Provoking French Citizens for Years


Free speech in France includes every form of anti-Catholic and anti-Islamist obscenity, which includes sodomizing cartoons of our religious leaders and even of the Trinity Itself!

The irony is that Judaism is protected by law while Catholicism and Islam are roundly blasphemed daily in France. One-sided censorship does not work! That's provocation!

Laws should be designed and reasonably adjusted to ensure peace!

Laws on the limits of free speech should never be made in a vacuum. They should be made considering the legitimate rights and sensibilities of all people. I must say that the French bias against Catholicism and Islam is, at the very least, shocking! But the French like to shock! Well, if you like to shock, you better like getting shocked!

I remember during my last visit in Paris I was so offended by a newspaper stand's calumny against the Catholic Church that I was compelled to yell at the vendor for his unwarranted and extreme provocation.

Catholics are complacent to react.

Islamists are less so.

I do not justify this outrageous man slaughter, but the editors of that newspaper have been offending God and men for too long!

Sometimes it takes an outrage like this for people to wake up to the unjust provocation with no recourse to response for the provoked (viz. the Islamist protests have been banned for months). So, you provoke them and then you gag them. Well, something is going to give! France cannot continue to pretend that religion is to be toyed with and mocked.

Read Chesterton's The Ball and the Cross which is precisely about upright zeal in defense of one's belief, which includes fighting for it!

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Philosophers in Pope Benedict XVI


Just considering the encyclicals, it is remarkable the conversation the Holy Father emeritus entertained with the most influential thinkers of our age. His attempt was to engage and to answer the modern intellectual prejudice.

I. Deus Caritas Est
He starts with Nietzsche beginning the first encyclical with his claim that Christianity has harmed eros and made it dirty, while in itself it is clean. This is a prevailing idea today, that the natural state of man is pure and innocent and it is the prudish squint of the Church which spoils it and thereby makes it bad. Cf. par. 3.


The Holy Father answers
1. By showing that eros was drunk with excess and every form of perversion long before Christianity came on the scene.
2. That the ancients themselves were the ones to realize that temperance, purification was necessary for true happiness, fulfillment and peace.
3. That the flesh itself is empty, man is body and soul.
4. Eros inclines and is fulfilled in agape: self-sacrificing love.

II. Spe Salvi
Having referenced Christ the philosopher-shepherd in the first sections of the encyclical, he gives an overview of the modern age hijacking of faith with a newly found faith in...science and praxis as the exclusive instrument of progress beginning with Francis Bacon, then politically implemented with the French Revolution and the positive assessment thereof by Immanuel Kant, Engles and Marx and Theodor W. Adorno.
Cf. par. 16-23.

III. Lumen Fidei (The third encyclical in the trilogy although published by his successor, yet almost unaltered, cf. 7)
Here again Benedict begins with Nietzsche (par. 2), with his formulation of the modern objection to faith as contrary to reason: that humanity is divided between those who follow truth and those who believe. This modern notion is that faith is contrary to intellectual rigor.

The Holy Father answers that true faith (e.g. Catholicism) is first of all concerned with Truth, the ultimate Truth, and that that concern for the ultimate truth is the foundation of all seeking and of all confidence in the solidity of any truth. Without God, without Christ truth has no ground on which to stand! Because God is true the truth is solid!

What is noteworthy is Pope Benedict's boldness in taking on the most iconic of the modern deconstructionist philosophers, the ones who call bad good and good bad, who call what is false true and what is true false. Pope Benedict enters the modern debate and briefly and effectively answers them with the Philosopher Christ! With the wisdom and the power of God their errors are put to shame, by the Vicar of Christ. What centuries of Christian philosophers have not been able to answer (because they have been working within the atheistic presuppositions of our adversaries) he answers using the Word of God and basic common sense and logic. Not just logic though. Logic enlightened and considered in the Light of Faith, as Christians should always act and think, admitting and applying the wisdom that is theirs.

This is why Saint Thomas Aquinas claimed that philosophy after Christ was dead. You cannot be an honest philosopher if you ignore the wisdom of Christ. You will end up in the most ridiculous forms of superstition because you will seek your wisdom in everyone and every philosophy except God. That is prejudicial. Not really honest at all. We cannot dissect wisdom.

Cuomo Funeral Scandals: Pro-Abortion, Pro-Homosexual Adulterous Politician Preaches Forty Minutes in Jesuit Church

Andrew Cuomo at Funeral with his Mistress

The Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, gave a 40 minute eulogy at his father, Mario Cuomo's funeral yesterday at the Jesuit Church: Saint Ignatius of Loyola.

Mario Cuomo was pro-abortion as is his son Andrew.
Andrew is also pro-homosexual (himself signing homosexual "marriage" into law in New York).
Andrew lives in open concubinage with his mistress.
Furthermore eulogies are forbidden at Catholic funerals!

Formal cooperation with (i.e. agreeing with) mortal sin is always a mortal sin.

Quandary: How do we have funerals in our Catholic Churches for "Catholics" who lived and died obstinately in grave manifest mortal sin, eulogized by "Catholics" living in the same condition with a few extra manifest mortal sins; and we must assume, as has become the custom, that everyone (perhaps even Bill Clinton, who is not even Catholic) happily went up for communion with no previous Confession. The fact that there has been no news regarding who received and who did not leads one to believe that it was row by row communion as in all high class parishes in America, especially in the reign of Cardinal Dolan (who is personal friends with the governor Andrew Cuomo) and Pope Francis.

I am very concerned about the future of any honest bishop or parish priest. With these kinds of sensationalized scandals where no one even notices the scandal even less dare to oppose it.

We are presently very far from the not so long ago tussle of Cardinal McCarrick who was fighting Cardinal Ratzinger and Cardinal Burke on the very issue of denying communion to pro-abortion politicians (that they should not be denied!). In the present climate what priest will dare uphold the Catholic sacramental discipline, and if he should dare, will there be a bishop behind him?

And the Jesuits with their praxis lead the way of widespread perversion and complete disorientation. The only positive thing I can see on the part of the Church is that the funeral was not in the Cathedral, Saint Patricks, nor by the Cardinal Archbishop. Thank God at least for that lessening of the glory given to bad Catholics.

Even President Obama in his message to the family made it a point to point out that Cuomo was a "good Catholic."

It would be much preferable that these traitor politicians would not claim to be Catholic.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Benedict XVI Ferula (Papal Staff) Revival


I was happy to see His Holiness Pope Francis use today the Ferula of his predecessor Pope Benedict XVI.
He bears is well!

Bravo also to the Successor of Saint Peter for his further catholicizing of the College of Cardinals (which has been long overdue given the disproportionate number of cardinals from those nations that could pay for the red hat!), continuing the trend of his predecessors of making it increasingly more representative of the Catholic population of the world (which is mainly in the southern hemisphere!). I am happy to have a Pope who is not afraid to lead!

It will take a while before the presbyteral and episcopal leadership in the US is righted in this regard; i.e. for it to be representative of the Catholic population of the nation, which for well over a decade is predominantly Latino!

The Holy Spirit cut right through all the political dung in the Church and gave us a Latino King who thinks for himself! God continues to defy our puny categories!

Religion is the Foundation of Law


In An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine (Chapter 1, Section 2:8), Newman shows that religion is necessary for...

+ Conscience (and the doctrine of a Moral Governor)
+ The Social Principle
+ Praying for the Dead
+ Rites and Ceremonies
+ Cultivation of Awe and Love towards what is great, high, and unseen.

Newman quotes Guizot at length on this matter.

"If we reduce religion," he says, "to a purely religious sentiment … it appears evident that it must and ought to remain a purely personal concern. But I am either strangely mistaken, or this religious sentiment is not the complete expression of the religious nature of man. Religion is, I believe, very different from this, and much more extended. There are problems in human nature, in human destinies, which cannot be solved in this life, which depend on an {50} order of things unconnected with the visible world, but which unceasingly agitate the human mind with a desire to comprehend them. The solution of these problems is the origin of all religion; her primary object is to discover the creeds and doctrines which contain, or are supposed to contain it.

"Another cause also impels mankind to embrace religion … From whence do morals originate? whither do they lead? is this self-existing obligation to do good, an isolated fact, without an author, without an end? does it not conceal, or rather does it not reveal to man, an origin, a destiny, beyond this world? The science of morals, by these spontaneous and inevitable questions, conducts man to the threshold of religion, and displays to him a sphere from whence he has not derived it. Thus the certain and never-failing sources of religion are, on the one hand, the problems of our nature; on the other, the necessity of seeking for morals a sanction, an origin, and an aim. It therefore assumes many other forms beside that of a pure sentiment; it appears a union of doctrines, of precepts, of promises. This is what truly constitutes religion; this is its fundamental character; it is not merely a form of sensibility, an impulse of the imagination, a variety of poetry.

"When thus brought back to its true elements, to its essential nature, religion appears no longer a purely personal concern, but a powerful and fruitful principle of association. Is it considered in the light of a system of belief, a system of dogmas? Truth is not the heritage of any individual, it is absolute and universal; mankind ought to seek and profess it in common. Is it considered with reference to the precepts that are associated with its doctrines? A law which is obligatory on a single individual, is so on all; it ought to be promulgated, and it is our duty to endeavour to bring all mankind under its {51} dominion. It is the same with respect to the promises that religion makes, in the name of its creeds and precepts; they ought to be diffused; all men should be incited to partake of their benefits. A religious society, therefore, naturally results from the essential elements of religion, and is such a necessary consequence of it that the term which expresses the most energetic social sentiment, the most intense desire to propagate ideas and extend society, is the word proselytism, a term which is especially applied to religious belief, and in fact consecrated to it.

"When a religious society has ever been formed, when a certain number of men are united by a common religious creed, are governed by the same religious precepts, and enjoy the same religious hopes, some form of government is necessary. No society can endure a week, nay more, no society can endure a single hour, without a government. The moment, indeed, a society is formed, by the very fact of its formation, it calls forth a government,—a government which shall proclaim the common truth which is the bond of the society, and promulgate and maintain the precepts that this truth ought to produce. The necessity of a superior power, of a form of government, is involved in the fact of the existence of a religious, as it is in that of any other society.

"And not only is a government necessary, but it naturally forms itself. ... When events are suffered to follow their natural laws, when force does not interfere, power falls into the hands of the most able, the most worthy, those who are most capable of carrying out the principles on which the society was founded. Is a warlike expedition in agitation? The bravest take the command. Is the object of the association learned research, or a scientific undertaking? The best informed will be the leader ... The inequality of faculties and influence, which is the foundation of power in civil life, has the same effect in a {52} religious society ... Religion has no sooner arisen in the human mind than a religious society appears; and immediately a religious society is formed, it produces its government." 
Guizot, Europ. Civil., Lect. v., Beckwith's Translation

Monday, January 5, 2015

Surfing World Champion Brazilian Gabriel Medina Praises God!


"Ah, Viva el Señor!"

"I talked to my mother and she said to me,
'No one is bigger than God!'

"I trust in God and I think that it was Him, you know.

"I'm so blessed..."

--Gabriel Medina upon August 2014 world championship win against Kelly Slater in Tahiti, the high point in his 2015 ASP (Association of Surfing Professionals) World Championship Tour (WCT) victory.

Someone should let this athlete know however that his tattoos are offensive to God! It is a form of self-mutilation (a mortal sin against the fifth commandment), permanently and unnecessarily disfiguring the beautiful organ God gave him--the skin. "Your body" is not yours: you belong to God!

Furthermore, with the tattoos he commits further sin--the sin of scandal--by leading, with that bad example, many other people to commit the same sin by imitation of the celebrity!

What is more, the tattoos are a sign of Gabriel Medina's need for holy counsel, which he might readily have if he seeks out a good Catholic priest--one who is loyal to the law of Christ and the Church--a spiritual director, for confession and regular, on-going, counsel. Otherwise his soul is in the greatest danger--as with all celebrity and worldly advantage.

Only the clean heart and pure hands ascend the mountain of the Lord! Psalm 24
The praise of men is nothing!

I must therefore recommend that Medina repent and go to confession to confess and be absolved of those (and all other) sins! Then, and only then, will God be truly praised!
Then the victory is real because it conquers the heart, more tortuous than all the waves!
(Cf. Jeremiah 17:9)

Examination of Conscience


6 STEPS FOR A GOOD CONFESSION


  • Examine your conscience - what sins have you committed since your last good confession.
  • Be sincerely sorry for your sins.
  • Confess your sins to the priest.
  • Make certain that you confess all your mortal sins and the number of them.
  • After your confession, do the penance the priest gives to you.
  • Pray daily for the strength to avoid the occasion of sin, especially for those sins you were just absolved from.

ACT OF CONTRITION


O my God, I am heartily sorry for having offended You, and I detest all my sins because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of Hell, but most of all because they offend You, my God, Who are all good and deserving of all my love. I firmly resolve, with the help of Your grace, to confess my sins, to do penance, and to amend my life.
Amen.

FIRST COMMANDMENT
"I am the Lord your God. You shall not have strange gods before Me." (Ex 20:2,3)


  • Did I doubt or deny that God exists?
  • Did I refuse to believe what God has revealed to us?
  • Did I believe in fortune telling, horoscopes, dreams, the occult, good-luck charms, tarot cards, palmistry, Ouija boards, seances, reincarnation?
  • Did I deny that I was Catholic?
  • Did I leave the Catholic Faith?
  • Did I give time to God each day in prayer?
  • Did I love God with my whole heart?
  • Did I despair of or presume on God's mercy?
  • Did I have false gods in my life that I gave greater attention to than God, like money, profession, drugs, TV, fame, pleasure, property, etc.?

SECOND COMMANDMENT
"You shall not take the Name of the Lord your God in vain." (Ex 20:7)


  • Did I blaspheme or insult God?
  • Did I take God's name carelessly or uselessly?
  • Did I curse, or break an oath or vow?
  • Did I get angry with God?

THIRD COMMANDMENT
"Remember that you keep holy the Sabbath Day." (Ex 20:8)


  • Did I miss Mass Sunday or a Holy Day of Obligation through my own fault?
  • Did I come to Mass on time? Leave early?
  • Did I do work on Sunday that was not necessary?
  • Did I set aside Sunday as a day of rest and a family day?
  • Did I show reverence in the presence of Jesus in the Most Blessed Sacrament?

FOURTH COMMANDMENT
"Honor your father and your mother." (Ex 20:12)


  • Did I disobey or disrespect my parents or legitimate superiors?
  • Did I neglect my duties to my husband, wife, children or parents?
  • Did I neglect to give good religious example to my family?
  • Did I fail to actively take an interest in the religious education and formation of my children?
  • Did I fail to educate myself on the true teachings of the Church?
  • Did I give scandal by what I said or did, especially to the young?
  • Did I cause anyone to leave the faith?
  • Did I cause tension and fights in my family?
  • Did I care for my aged and infirm relatives?
  • Did I give a full day's work for a full day's pay?
  • Did I give a fair wage to my employees?

FIFTH COMMANDMENT
"You shall not kill." (Ex 20:13)


  • Did I kill or physically injure anyone?
  • Did I have an abortion, or advise someone else to have an abortion? (One who procures an abortion is automatically excommunicated, as is anyone who is involved in an abortion, Canon 1398. The excommunication will be lifted in the Sacrament of Reconciliation.)
  • Did I use or cause my spouse to use birth control pills (whether or not realizing that birth control pills do abort the fetus if and when conceived)?
  • Did I attempt suicide?
  • Did I take part in or approve of "mercy killing" (euthanasia)?
  • Did I get angry, impatient, envious, unkind, proud, revengeful, jealous, hateful toward another, lazy?
  • Did I give bad example by drug abuse, drinking alcohol to excess, fighting, quarreling?
  • Did I abuse my children?
  • Did I mutilate myself or others (e.g. sterilization, tattoos, non-therapeutic cosmetic surgery, or excessive piercings).

SIXTH & NINTH COMMANDMENTS
"You shall not commit adultery." (Ex 20:14) "You shall not covet your neighbor's wife." (Ex 20:17)


Note: In the area of deliberate sexual sins listed below, all are mortal sins if there is sufficient reflection and full consent of the will. "No fornicators, idolaters, or adulterers, no sodomites,... will inherit the kingdom of God." (1 Cor 6:9-10) "Anyone who looks lustfully at a woman has already committed adultery with her in his thoughts." (Mt 5:28)
  • Did I willfully entertain impure thoughts or desires?
  • Did I use impure or suggestive words? Tell impure stories? Listen to them?
  • Did I deliberately look at impure TV, videos, plays, pictures or movies? Or deliberately read impure materials?
  • Did I commit impure acts by myself (masturbation)?
  • Did I commit impure acts with another - fornication (premarital sex), adultery (sex with a married person)?
  • Did I practice artificial birth control (by pills, device, withdrawal)?
  • Did I marry or advise anyone to marry outside the Church?
  • Did I avoid the occasions of impurity?
  • Did I try to control my thoughts?
  • Did I engage in homosexual activity?
  • Did I respect all members of the opposite sex, or have I thought of other people as objects?
  • Did I or my spouse have sterilization done?
  • Did I abuse my marriage rights?

SEVENTH & TENTH COMMANDMENTS
"You shall not steal." (Ex 20:15) "You shall not covet your neighbor's goods." (Ex 20:17)


  • Did I steal, cheat, help or encourage others to steal or keep stolen goods? Have I made restitution for stolen goods?
  • Did I fulfill my contracts; give or accept bribes; pay my bills; rashly gamble or speculate; deprive my family of the necessities of life?
  • Did I waste time at work, school or at home?
  • Did I envy other people's families or possessions?
  • Did I make material possessions the purpose of my life?

EIGHTH COMMANDMENT
"You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor." (Ex 20:16)


  • Did I lie?
  • Did I deliberately deceive others, or injure others by lies?
  • Did I commit perjury?
  • Did I gossip or reveal others' faults or sins?
  • Did I fail to keep secret what should be confidential?

OTHER SINS


  • Did I fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday?
  • Did I eat meat on the Fridays of Lent or Ash Wednesday?
  • Did I fail to receive Holy Communion during Eastertime?
  • Did I go to Holy Communion in a state of mortal sin? Without fasting (water and medicine permitted) for one hour from food and drink?
  • Did I make a bad confession?
  • Did I fail to contribute to the support of the Church?

"Whoever eats the bread and drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily sins against the Body and Blood of the Lord. ... He who eats and drinks without recognizing the Body eats and drinks judgement on himself." (1 Cor 11:27-29)
So, to receive Holy Communion while in the state of mortal sin (having committed a mortal sin which has not been confessed and forgiven in the Sacrament of Confession) is itself a mortal sin - a mortal sin of sacrilege.
"O God, be merciful to me, a sinner." (Lk 18:13)
"Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven..." (Jn 20:23)
"Though your sins be like scarlet, they shall become white as snow. Though they be red like crimson, they shall become white as wool." (Is 1:18)
"If we confess our sins, He who is upright can be depended upon to forgive sins, and to cleanse us from every wrong." (1 Jn 1:9)
"Father, forgive them; they do not know what they are doing." (Lk 23:24)
"Forgive us our sins, for we too forgive all who do us wrong." (Lk 11:4)


Dietrich von Hildebrand Corrects Descartes/Modernity


"Man is in dialogue with objects and with persons outside of himself, and rare are the moments when man has to look at himself. These are the moments when you make an examination of conscience. And you don't make an examination of conscience twelve hours a day. Most of the time you are object centered and then there are moments when you have to look upon yourself and gain self-consciousness and realize the mistakes that you have made."

Dietrich von Hildebrand, Transformation in Christ. (Quote from a recorded conference of Alice von Hildebrand "The Tragedy of Thomas Merton": Keep the Faith, Fairfield, New Jersey noting how psychoanalysis, communism and eastern mysticism destroyed Merton [and myriad other American religious].)

N.B. Even the examination of conscience is in dialogue, dialogue with God and with the Church, repenting and beginning again in dialogue with Christ our Lord.

Contraception and abortion causes neurosis, for an infant (in holy marriage) is the greatest remedy for self-absorption! Why do you think God came to the earth by becoming a conceptus! Man needs to be needed!

Harlem is God's Commentary on Park Avenue



"...What has not been devoured, in your dark furnace, Harlem, by marihuana, by gin, by insanity, hysteria, syphilis?...

“...Now the terrifying paradox of the whole thing is this: Harlem itself, and every individual Negro in it, is a living condemnation of our so-called ‘culture.’ Harlem is there by way of a divine indictment against New York City and the people who live downtown and make their money downtown. The brothels of Harlem, and all its prostitution, and its dope-rings, and all the rest are the mirror of the polite divorces and the manifold cultured adulteries of Park Avenue: they are God’s commentary on the whole of our society.

"Harlem is, in a sense, what God thinks of Hollywood. And Hollywood is all Harlem has, in its despair, to grasp at, by way of a surrogate for heaven.

"The most terrible thing about it all is that there is not a Negro in the whole place who does not realize, somewhere in the depths of his nature, that the culture of the white men is not worth the dirt in Harlem’s gutters. They sense that the whole thing is rotten, that it is a fake, that it is spurious, empty, a shadow of nothingness. And yet they are condemned to reach out for it, and to seem to desire it, and to pretend they like it, as if the whole thing were some kind of bitter cosmic conspiracy: as if they were thus being forced to work out, in their own lives, a clear representation of the misery which has corrupted the ontological roots of the white man’s own existence.

"The little children of Harlem are growing up, crowded together like sardines in the rooms of tenements full of vice, where evil takes place hourly and inescapably before their eyes, so that there is not an excess of passion, not a perversion of natural appetite with which they are not familiar before the age of six or seven: and this by way of an accusation of the polite and expensive and furtive sensualities and lusts of the rich whose sins have bred this abominable slum. The effect resembles and even magnifies the cause, and Harlem is the portrait of those through whose fault such things come into existence. What was heard in secret in the bedrooms and apartments of the rich and of the cultured and the educated and the white is preached from the housetops of Harlem and there declared, for what it is, in all its horror, somewhat as it is seen in the eyes of God, naked and frightful.

"No, there is not a Negro in the whole place who can fail to know, in the marrow of his own bones, that the white man’s culture is not worth the jetsam in the Harlem River.”

Thomas Merton, The Seven Story Mountain (1948), New York: Harcourt, 1976, 345-346.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

Ex-Gays

PFOX (Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays) Billboard

Taking the rights fight to the next level!

"Who are we to judge!" --Pope Francis (in context!)

The picture above is of an I-95 billboard in Virginia put up last month.

The Shrine of the Three Kings (Wise Men)

1248 Design!

The Shrine of the Three Kings is a huge reliquary containing the relics of the Three Wise Men.

The world class Cologne Cathedral was designed and built to house that reliquary where it is centrally enshrined in the choir of that "Saint Peter's of the North" (Ecclesia Cathedralis Sanctorum Petri et Mariae).

The Pope Proves the Wise Men and the Star Were Real

"Happy Sunday!"


Someone just greeted me thus and I thought: "What a great way to keep God in Sunday."

Keep Christ in Sunday.

Just say it!

Happy Sunday!


N.B. In many of the Romance languages it is a long-standing custom to greet people that way in honor of the Lord's day. E.g. buona Domenica in Italian.

Anti-Sodomy Sign Suggestion (Responding to Militant Homosexualism)



ANTI-SODOMY ZONE

NO LEWD CONDUCT

No Public
Displays of Homosexual Affection
Allowed

(Take your shameful "gay pride" elsewhere!)
(It will not be tolerated here!)
(Keep [if you must] your perversions to yourself!)


N.B. This announcement should not be offensive to anyone. It is simply a basic requirement of common decency. You can't parade your highly offensive behavior and expect it be tolerated! Otherwise you are mocking every decent citizen! You don't want me to mock you, don't mock me!


Big Earl's does in fact have a sign to that effect: "Men must act like men and women must act like ladies (heterosexually, of course)!"
What is more, if men and women are acting decently, they will not be displaying their perverse sexual preferences.

Friday, January 2, 2015

The Epiphany Announcement of Easter and the Moveable Feasts 2015 (English and español)

2014 Announcement NLM

On Epiphany there is an ancient custom of announcing the dates of movable feasts for the coming year. This proclamation has been used in connection with the blessing and distribution of calendars. This Epiphany Proclamation may take place after the reading of the Gospel, or within or after the homily. It may be solemnly sung by the deacon, the presider, or cantor from the ambo. See the Roman Missal, Appendix I: The Announcement of Easter and the Moveable Feasts. --Ordo

Below is the text from that Appendix with the 2015 dates included.

Know, dear brethren (brothers and sisters), that, as we have rejoiced at the Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ, so by leave of God's mercy we announce to you also the joy of his Resurrection, who is our Savior.

On the eighteenth day of February will fall Ash Wednesday, and the beginning of the fast of the most sacred Lenten season.

On the fifth day of April you will celebrate with joy Easter Day,
the Paschal feast of our Lord Jesus Christ.

[In those places where the Ascension is observed on Thursday:
On the fourteenth day of May will be the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ.]

[In those places where the Ascension is transferred to the Seventh Sunday of Easter:

On the seventeenth day of May will be the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ.]

On the twenty-fourth day of May, the feast of Pentecost.

On the seventh day of June, the feast of the Most Holy Body and Blood of Christ.

On the twenty-ninth day of November, the First Sunday of the Advent of our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom is honor and glory for ever and ever.


Amen.

--

Anuncio del día de la Pascua
(Plinthos translation)

Sépase hermanos, que, así como nos hemos alegrado por el Nacimiento de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo, con el favor de la misericordia de Dios, les anunciamos la alegría de Su Resurrección, Quien es nuestro Salvador.

El 
décimo-octavo día de febrero será Miércoles de Cenizas, comienzo del ayuno de la Sagrada Cuaresma.

El quinto día de abril celebrar
án con alegría la Santa Pascua de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo.

[Donde se celebra el jueves la Ascenci
ón:
El décimo-cuarto día de mayo, la Ascensión del Señor.]

[Donde se celebra el s
éptimo domingo de Pascua la Ascención:
El décimo-septimo día de mayo, la Ascensión del Señor.]

El 
vigésimo-cuarto día de mayo, la fiesta de Pentecostés.

El s
éptimo día de junio, la fiesta del Santísimo Cuerpo y Sangre de Cristo.

El vig
ésimo-noveno día de noviembre el primer Domingo del Adviento de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo, a Quien sea el honor y la gloria por los siglos de los siglos.

R. Amén.

Homiletic Directory




The Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments has announced the publication of a homiletic directory. The production of the new directory is in response to Pope Francis' request made in the Apostolic Exhortation Evangelii Gaudium.

Here is Vatican Radio's report thereof (only found it in Portuguese so far). 

Plinthos also has some thoughts on preaching and not preaching here.

Honest Atheism

The Foundation of Faith

"If Christianity is untrue, then no honest man will want to believe it, however helpful it might be; if it is true, every honest man will want to believe it, even if it gives him no help at all."
C. S. Lewis - Essay, Man or Rabbit.

"If there were no God, there would be no atheists."
Chesterton - Where all roads lead, 1922

"The Christian pities men because they are dying, and the Buddhist pities them because they are living. The Christian is sorry for what damages the life of a man; but the Buddhist is sorry for him because he is alive."
Chesterton - Generally Speaking

"There is only one reason an intelligent person doesn't believe in miracles. He believes in materialism."
Chesterton - St. Francis of Assisi

"God is not merely good, but goodness; goodness is not merely divine, but God."
C. S. Lewis - Christian Reflections, 1943

"A great many of those who 'debunk' traditional...values have in the background values of their own which they believe to be immune from the debunking process."
C. S. Lewis -The Abolition of Man

"In coming to understand anything we are rejecting the facts as they are for us in favour of the facts as they are."
C. S. Lewis - An Experiment in Criticism

"It is safe to tell the pure in heart that they shall see God, for only the pure in heart want to."
C. S. Lewis

"If men will not be governed by the Ten Commandments, they shall be governed by ten thousand commandments."
G. K. Chesterton

"You can only find truth with logic if you have already found truth without it."
Chesterton, The Man Who Was Orthodox, 1963

"The safest road to Hell is the gradual one--the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts."
C. S. Lewis (1898-1963) The Screwtape Letters

"Aim at heaven and you will get earth thrown in. Aim at earth and you get neither."
C. S. Lewis

"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."
C. S. Lewis Is Theology Poetry?

http://www.apologetics.net/

Pinocchio, Christ and Our Lady


Having read The Adventures of Pinocchio to my nephews several times (after having first read it also in the original Florentine Italian) what comes out loud and clear is the supernatural element. Pinocchio, in it's unabridged version, is a metaphor for the fundamental human vocation to be divinized in Christ. Every man is called by God to become more than a man in uniting to Christ who is God. True humanity is united to divinity!

First, the wood has a personality and a spirit for which Master Cherry gives it away to Geppetto who makes a puppet of it.

Next, the wooden puppet with a human spirit does not have the capacity for true goodness, true humanity, he is lazy and disobedient which is the cause of all his ills, though he wants to be good he does not have the power because he has a wooden head and a wooden heart!

The power which makes the difference in overcoming his besetting weakness of will (he cannot do the good he wants to do) comes from his relationships with those who have his true best interest at heart: His Babo (Geppetto), the talking cricket, and especially his Fairy God Mother! When he finally gets out of himself he is thereby transformed into a man, always with the intervention of the Fairy with the Blue Hair--Our Lady!

No one can convince me that the author did not intend some allusion to the Madonna, ubiquitious in all households and towns, even in the Italy of today! This is the story of every man, who will only become a real man when he learns to make a donation of himself on the occasion of work, for others. Our Lady is the sweetest encouragement in that, and grace (God's free gift) is the only source of power for that work.

The development of the story in the newspaper.
http://cinquantamila.corriere.it/storyTellerThread.php?threadId=pinocchio

Biffi and Messorio a story of salvation.
http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/1999/aprile/15/Pinocchio_bravo_burattino_cattolico_laici_co_0_9904153214.shtml

The Masonic Angle
http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/the-esoteric-interpretation-of-pinocchio/

Thursday, January 1, 2015

The "I'm Spiritual but not Religious" Errror


What that statement seems to mean is that you believe in God but do not follow any organized religion. You have faith but it is strictly personal.

The implication is that faith is good but official religion is corrupt.

The language is sloppy because religion, the acts of religion, are much broader than simply belonging to a body of believers.

"Religion consists in an operation by which man honors God by submitting to Him; and this operation ought to be in harmony with Him who is honored, and with the one offering homage." Aquinas
There are therefore three major types of religious acts.

1. Raising the heart and mind to God: acts of the theological virtues of faith, hope and love.

2. Bodily actions ordered toward God: acts of worship like vocal prayers, sacrifices offered to God, prostrations, kneelings, bowings, signs of the cross, arms outstretched, etc.

3. Acts of love toward our neighbor, for love of God.

Saint Thomas Aquinas, in his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius defines religion in it's relationship to faith. Religion is every action directed to God while faith is simply the mental act ordered to God. So the act of faith is foundational to religious activity as the primary motive behind divine service. But religion can use any virtue in it's divine service, so it is much broader, the world is the limit! Therefore, if you are "spiritual", i.e. have faith, you must be religious because the act of faith itself is chief among religious acts. If you have faith you are ipso facto religious because your act of faith is an act of religion: the first act thereof!

What is involved here is an error of logic. People claim to reject religion because of the sins of religious people. But they are all the while doing acts of religion while discriminating those they consider "religious." You don't hate breathing air because people that breath air happen to sin! Sinning and breathing air are two different activities. Religion is not a sin even though all religious people happen to sin (except Jesus and Mary). Identify and reject the sin, and try to save the sinner, among whom you are also one in need of saving.

P.S. "Spiritual" people are sinners too! I recall an interview with one of John Lennon's lovers who was initially so much infatuated with the music idol until she realized how morally dissolute that man was. She was shocked that someone so "spiritual" could be so bad! Welcome to the real world. It's not religion that makes people bad. Sin does that, sin alone!

God did not make evil, devils and men did (beginning with Adam and Eve with the ancient serpent against God!).


De Trinitate Commentary Q. 3, Art. 2, Resp.  How Faith is Related to Religion (Excerpt)

Now since He who is reverenced is a spirit, He cannot be approached by the body, but only by the mind; and so worship of Him consists chiefly in acts of the mind by which the mind itself is ordained to God. These acts are principally those of the theological virtues; and in accordance with this, Augustine says that God is worshiped by faith, hope, and charity, to which are added also the acts of the gifts ordained toward God, such as those of wisdom and of fear.
But because we who honor God are also possessed of bodies and receive our knowledge through bodily senses, there is the necessity that certain physical actions accompany the worship of God, not only that we may render service to God with our whole being, but also that by these bodily actions we may arouse in ourselves and in others acts of the mind ordained to God. Wherefore Augustine says in his book, De cura pro mortuis habenda: “Those who pray make the members of their bodies conform to their acts of supplication when they genuflect, extend their hands, or prostrate themselves upon the ground, or perform any other visible action; and although it is their invisible will and the intention of the heart that is known to God, it is not unseemly that the human soul should so express itself, but rather by so doing man stirs himself to pray and to lament his sins the more humbly and fervently.”

Hence, all acts by which man subjects himself to God, whether they are acts of mind or of body, pertain to religion. But because those things that are rendered to the neighbor on account of God are rendered to God Himself, it is evident that they also pertain to this same subjection in which religious worship consists; and so to one diligently considering the matter it is apparent that every good act pertains to religion. Hence Augustine says (loc. cit.): “True sacrifice is every work done that we may adhere to God in holy companionship; however, in a certain order.” First and foremost, those acts of the mind ordained to God pertain to the worship which we are speaking of. Secondly, there are acts of the body intended to arouse reverence of mind or to give expression to it, such as prostrations, sacrifices, and the like. Thirdly, there also pertain to divine worship all other acts ordained to the neighbor for the sake of God.

Sancta Teresia Benedicta a Cruce


On this day in 1922 Edith Stein was baptized.

This is the interior of the Imperial Cathedral of Saint Bartholomew ("The Emperor's Cathedral") in Frankfurt where, as a Jew, the young philosophy professor was so moved by the Catholic devotion of the visit to the Most Blessed Sacrament in Church.

This is how the Cathedral looked a century ago when Saint Edith Stein knew it in all it's Gothic Imperial splendor.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...