Saturday, November 15, 2014

Cooperatores Veritatis


Traditional clergy and Catholics are quite expert in the Truth but at times negligent in their zeal for Cooperation!

Cooperate in the Truth! Strive to work together with the others!

And, in the present Pontificate it is the will of God that we put our emphasis upon this cooperating! If we do that, we will keep our jobs and conquer the world!

Serve the Lord with your intelligence, to save your skin and to serve others in the truth. Ensure your efficacy, if you can! with all your wit!

Matthew 10:16 Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves. 17But beware of men.

Remember, Ratzinger gave communion in the hand until he became Pope! And only then did he insist on kneeling and on the tongue as the proper posture to receive.

Use common sense to serve the Lord. Don't try to do more than you can actually achieve! Remember that even a man like Ratzinger wisely recognizes his limits and shrinks back when it is necessary, without sin.

N. B. Three things that bring great peace.

Imitation of Christ, III, 23: 1-7

Strive, My Son, to ...

1. ...Do another's will rather than thine own...
2. ...Choose always to have less rather than more...
3. ...Seek always after the lowest place, and to be subject to all...
4. ...Wish always and pray that the will of God be fulfilled in thee...

...Behold, such a man as this entereth into the inheritance of peace and quietness.

E.g. Even if your bishop or pastor or other competent ecclesial authority expects you to break Canon Law (except regarding ius divinum), if they will destroy you for your stubbornness in this, you should usually acquiesce in that instance (albeit without agreeing) for the good of the Church! Kindly state your case if you must (yet even there use common sense, for the glory of God and the exaltation of Holy Mother Church) but obey. You will not sin if they make you break the human laws of the Church and the Liturgy (ius humanum) as long as you do not break the law of God (viz. the ten commandments)! That is called cooperating in the truth!

Having said that, some people are called to be martyrs, even for Canon Law and Liturgical Law, but not everyone is called to that particular type of martyrdom. Don't make yourself a martyr before the time appointed by God. Christ might need you for something later, to bring the Truth to the world through your long suffering cooperation!

Christ escaped death many times, until His Hour, appointed by the Father!

Luke 16:8 "And the lord commended the unjust steward, forasmuch as he had done wisely: for the children of this world are wiser in their generation than the children of light."

Family Matters


Here is a brand new sculpture called "family."

Question. What will the uninitiated observer think when he sees it? What does it represent?

A woman, two children and a pregnant woman.

The only relationship which is clear is that of the pregnant woman with her unborn child.

Presumably the born children are also the children of one or other of the women. One woman might be the mother of one of the born children and the other woman of the other born child, or one of the women or the other might be the mother of both of the children.

What is impossible is that both women be the mothers of any of the three children at the same time and in the same respect, except, of course, by adoption; and to that extent the children would be orphans, a tragedy.

The other logical presumption is that the women themselves are not "spouses" for that also is an physical impossibility, there is no one to penetrate and to impregnate. You cannot produce calves without a bull!

As it turns out the two women are sisters and have one of the born children each, two  men are missing (or three depending on whether the pregnant woman was impregnated by the same father of her born child)!

So, the one thing this statue does not do, in itself, is represent the basic family unit which, to date, is husband, wife and children.

That statue may represent any number of relationships and social arrangements, but not a family!

God Himself, born of the Virgin, did not neglect to have a father on this earth, even though his biological father was God the Father alone.

PIETAS
Marriage matters
Because husband and wife matter
And because mom and dad matter
And because family matters,
And all because God matters!

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Pope Emeritus has Audience with American Monsignor of North American College

Monsignor Anthony Figuereido, a priest of the Archdiocese of Newark and a spiritual director at the North American College in Rome, visited last Thursday, 6th of November, and exchanged a zucchetto, with the Emeritus Pope. Monsignor Figuereido was part of a delegation of the confederation Caritas in Veritate International.

The Holy Father Emeritus told the group: "Charity without faith has no meaning and faith without charity is a dead letter."

Sacerdote intercambia solideos con un “saludable y brillante” Benedicto XVI

Benedicto XVI y Mons. Anthony Figuereido. Foto: Caritas In Veritate International.
Benedicto XVI y Mons. Anthony Figuereido. Foto: Caritas In Veritate International.
ROMA, 13 Nov. 14 / 08:02 pm (ACI/EWTN Noticias).- Hace unos días un sacerdote hizo parte de una antigua tradición e intercambió el solideo –el sombrero blanco que usa el Papa– que llevaba con el que en ese momento llevaba el Sumo Pontífice Emérito Benedicto XVI, a quien describió como “muy saludable y brillante”.
La antigua tradición consiste en que si se compra un solideo blanco en la sastrería del Papa y se presenta durante una audiencia papal, la Guardia Suiza se encargará de intercambiarlo por el que lleva el Santo Padre en ese momento.
En este caso el intercambio se hizo personalmente y en una audiencia privada en el Vaticano. En declaraciones a ACI Prensa el 7 de noviembre, Mons. Anthony Figuereido señaló que “nos puso muy contentos la alegría de Benedicto y su serenidad. Él es un hombre de paz, una paz en la voluntad de Dios para él hoy, que es rezar por la Iglesia”.
Este sacerdote sirve como director espiritual en el Pontificio Colegio Norteamericano y visitó al Sumo Pontífice Emérito junto a una delegación de la confederación “Caritas in Veritate International”, una institución que labora en 80 países y cuya fundación se inspiró en las encíclicas de Benedicto XVI, Caritas in veritate y Deus Caritas est.
Tras comentar que atesorará el solideo en todos los años por venir, Mons. Figuereido comentó que Benedicto XVI es “un hombre tierno lleno de humildad”, un buen ejemplo de lo que el Papa Francisco quiere decir cuando habla de la ternura.
Benedicto XVI “está con muy buena salud y su mente está muy aguda, tal vez más aguda que cuando fue el gran teólogo y el gran Papa que supimos fue para todos”, indicó.
El sacerdote dijo luego que Benedicto XVI los felicitó y les agradeció por ver que sus encíclicas habían promovido una organización que ponía la caridad por obra. “Nos alentó a vivir en caridad y en fe. Dijo algo muy significativo: ‘la caridad sin fe no tiene sentido, y la fe sin caridad es letra muerte’”.  
Tras señalar que Benedicto XVI es un gran ejemplo para los seminaristas y sacerdotes, Mons. Figuereido indicó que “el púlpito más grande desde el que Benedicto XVI ha predicado es su gran testimonio de humildad. Aquí hay un hombre que llegó a lo más alto, digamos, de la Iglesia. Es sucesor de Pedro, pero no temió dejar tal dignidad”.

The "Christ" of the Enthusiasts

Starting step is actually Catholicism, then Protestantism the first descent!...
Pope Francis is feeding the modern sensation of a Christ without clear judgement--a caricature of Christ.

It is thus not surprising that ambiguous figures like Cardinal McCarrick (who most probably was a Bergoglio man in the 2005 conclave) along with Cardinal Kaspar should enjoy high favor in Rome today.

This entire movement in the Church is a century old heresy called modernism: general confusion of doctrine and morality, claiming a purer form of religion going beyond the strictures of Catholicism. Robert Barron has a good synopsis of the academic origins in the philosopher Baruch Spinoza as developed in Kung and Schillebeeckx, the icons of post Vatican II modernism.

"In Kung and Schillebeeckx we notice...a bracketing of the dogmatic claims of the church, followed by a reinterpretation of those claims in light of a rationalist historical reconstruction...we see in both theologians a tendency to express the essence of Christianity in basically moral terms, not so much the private morality characteristic of Kant but the postmodern political ethic of inclusiveness, equality, and collective human florishing... p. 46

"We could call it the 'Christ of the enthusiasts,' ranging from Marxist revolutionaries to charismatics, rock singers [e.g. Elton John likes Pope Francis without any indication of conversion!] to social activists, [some] of whom invoke Jesus but in a a superficial and fragmentary way." p. 36

The Priority of Christ: Toward a Postliberal Catholicism, Robert Barron

On Gratitude


Gratitude is expressed in adoration.

Luke 17:15And one of them, when he saw that he was made clean, went back, with a loud voice glorifying God. 16And he fell on his face before his feet, giving thanks: and this was a Samaritan.

The cured leper does the following in response to Christ curing him.

--Returns to Jesus
--Publicly praises God in a loud voice
--Prostrates/kneels before the Blessed Lord
--Thanks Jesus Christ

Wednesday xxxii week of ordinary time.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Military Costume Tyranny


It is most ironic that the military, the police, knights, scouts and bands the world over maintain their traditions of colorful outfits while our rulers walk around bare-headed in simple business suits.

Why? Well, many rulers have lost their crowned heads in recent centuries!

It seems to me that the Church in this is just going along with the tide of the worldly powers. Catholic triumphalism has long since been greeted with the sword and the sword won the day! So the sword wielding soldiers still dress up but no king, prince or priest will dare to do so!

This is part of the modern hypocrisy of egalitarianism. The ruler dresses humbly yet rules all the more ruthlessly.

So, the slaves dress up and the kings dress down.

All the more reason for low ranking clergy to dress up, especially if they are not interested in becoming princes! But, beware, you may very well become a cassock (or cappa) martyr!

N.B. Even Pope Francis himself never goes out without his cassock, which is proper!

On Dressing Up (For Church)


Why do so many clerics have trouble with their confreres' preference for more rather than less in clerical attire?

Some people dress down to go to Church, some people dress in their Sunday best. Priests represent the Church, some dress down to represent her, others dress up. Take your pick! Each will be judged accordingly.

Just remember, there is no parable about a man being thrown out of the banquet for being dressed up with the wedding garment!

I know a priest who will only wear his cassock in his room! He changes to go out.  He has no problem roaming the wide world dressed as if he were a layman and yet cannot get himself to go out on the street with the cassock. Go figure!

This thought came to me after Sunday Mass at my ethnic and largely Haitian parish where the families all dress up very formally for Mass--like for no other occasion: men and women in formal dress and hats of all types and national traditions! Splendid!

How ridiculous the spectacle of the now infamous Saint Patrick's day parade where all of the men in traditional attire wear their distinctive hats and the princes of the Church go bare headed!

"But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord!" (Joshua 24:15)

Monday, November 10, 2014

The Tome of Leo


The "Tome" of Saint Leo was read and included in the decrees of the Council of Chalcedon (451), merely twenty years after the Ephesus Council, which defined Mary the Theotokos (431). The clarity of Leo's Christology was based upon the Church's well defined Mariology!

To Flavian commonly called the "Tome".

I. Eutyches has been driven into his error by presumption and ignorance.
Having read your letter, beloved, at the late arrival of which we are surprised , and having perused the detailed account of the bishops' acts , we have at last found out what the scandal was which had arisen among you against the purity of the Faith: and what before seemed concealed has now been unlocked and laid open to our view: from which it is shown that Eutyches, who used to seem worthy of all respect in virtue of his priestly office, is very unwary and exceedingly ignorant, so that it is even of him that the prophet has said: he refused to understand so as to do well: he thought upon iniquity in his bed. But what more iniquitous than to hold blasphemous opinions , and not to give way to those who are wiser and more learned than our self. Now into this unwisdom fall they who, finding themselves hindered from knowing the truth by some obscurity, have recourse not to the prophets' utterances, not to the Apostles' letters, nor to the injunctions of the Gospel but to their own selves: and thus they stand out as masters of error because they were never disciples of truth. For what learning has he acquired about the pages of the New and Old Testament, who has not even grasped the rudiments of the Creed? And that which, throughout the world, is professed by the mouth of every one who is to be born again , is not yet taken in by the heart of this old man.

II. Concerning the twofold nativity and nature of Christ.
Not knowing, therefore, what he was bound to think concerning the incarnation of the Word of God, and not wishing to gain the light of knowledge by researches through the length and breadth of the Holy Scriptures, he might at least have listened attentively to that general and uniform confession, whereby the whole body of the faithful confess that they believe in God the Father Almighty, and in Jesus Christ, His only Son , our Lord, who was born of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary. By which three statements the devices of almost all heretics are overthrown. For not only is God believed to be both Almighty and the Father, but the Son is shown to be co-eternal with Him, differing in nothing from the Father because He is God from God , Almighty from Almighty, and being born from the Eternal one is co-eternal with Him; not later in point of time, not lower in power, not unlike in glory, not divided in essence: but at the same time the only begotten of the eternal Father was born eternal of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary. And this nativity which took place in time took nothing from, and added nothing to that divine and eternal birth, but expended itself wholly on the restoration of man who had been deceived : in order that he might both vanquish death and overthrow by his strength , the Devil who possessed the power of death. For we should not now be able to overcome the author of sin and death unless He took our nature on Him and made it His own, whom neither sin could pollute nor death retain. Doubtless then, He was conceived of the Holy Spirit within the womb of His Virgin Mother, who brought Him forth without the loss of her virginity, even as she conceived Him without its loss.

But if he could not draw a rightful understanding (of the matter) from this pure source of the Christian belief, because he had darkened the brightness of the clear truth by a veil of blindness peculiar to himself, he might have submitted himself to the teaching of the Gospels. And when Matthew speaks of the Book of the Generation of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the Son of Abraham Matthew 1:1, he might have also sought out the instruction afforded by the statements of the Apostles. And reading in the Epistle to the Romans, Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called an Apostle, separated unto the Gospel of God, which He had promised before by His prophets in the Holy Scripture concerning His son, who was made unto Him of the seed of David after the flesh Romans 1:1-3, he might have bestowed a loyal carefulness upon the pages of the prophets. And finding the promise of God who says to Abraham, In your seed shall all nations be blest Genesis 12:3, to avoid all doubt as to the reference of this seed, he might have followed the Apostle when He says, To Abraham were the promises made and to his seed. He says not and to seeds, as if in many, but as it in one, and to your seed which is Christ Galatians 3:16 .Isaiah's prophecy also he might have grasped by a closer attention to what he says, Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bear a Son and they shall call His name Emmanuel, which is interpreted God with us. And the same prophet's words he might have read faithfully. A child is born to us, a Son is given to us, whose power is upon His shoulder, and they shall call His name the Angel of the Great Counsel, Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the Prince of Peace, the Father of the age to come. And then he would not speak so erroneously as to say that the Word became flesh in such a way that Christ, born of the Virgin's womb, had the form of man, but had not the reality of His mother's body. Or is it possible that he thought our Lord Jesus Christ was not of our nature for this reason, that the angel, who was sent to the blessed Mary ever Virgin, says, The Holy Ghost shall come upon you and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you: and therefore that Holy Thing also that shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God Luke 1:35, on the supposition that as the conception of the Virgin was a Divine act, the flesh of the conceived did not partake of the conceiver's nature? But that birth so uniquely wondrous and so wondrously unique, is not to be understood in such wise that the properties of His kind were removed through the novelty of His creation. For though the Holy Spirit imparted fertility to the Virgin, yet a real body was received from her body; and, Wisdom building her a house Proverbs 9:1, the Word became flesh and dwelt in us , that is, in that flesh which he took from man and which he quickened with the breath of a higher life.

III. The Faith and counsel of God in regard to the incarnation of the Word are set forth.
Without detriment therefore to the properties of either nature and substance which then came together in one person , majesty took on humility, strength weakness, eternity mortality: and for the paying off of the debt belonging to our condition inviolable nature was united with possible nature, so that, as suited the needs of our case , one and the same Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, could both die with the one and not die with the other. Thus in the whole and perfect nature of true man was true God born, complete in what was His own, complete in what was ours. And by ours we mean what the Creator formed in us from the beginning and what He undertook to repair. For what the Deceiver brought in and man deceived committed, had no trace in the Saviour. Nor, because He partook of man's weaknesses, did He therefore share our faults. He took the form of a slave without stain of sin, increasing the human and not diminishing the divine: because that emptying of Himself whereby the Invisible made Himself visible and, Creator and Lord of all things though He be, wished to be a mortal, was the bending down of pity, not the failing of power. Accordingly He who while remaining in the form of God made man, was also made man in the form of a slave. For both natures retain their own proper character without loss: and as the form of God did not do away with the form of a slave, so the form of a slave did not impair the form of God. For inasmuch as the Devil used to boast that man had been cheated by his guile into losing the divine gifts, and bereft of the boon of immortality had undergone sentence of death, and that he had found some solace in his troubles from having a partner in delinquency , and that God also at the demand of the principle of justice had changed His own purpose towards man whom He had created in such honour: there was need for the issue of a secret counsel, that the unchangeable God whose will cannot be robbed of its own kindness, might carry out the first design of His Fatherly care towards us by a more hidden mystery ; and that man who had been driven into his fault by the treacherous cunning of the devil might not perish contrary to the purpose of God.

IV. The properties of the twofold nativity and nature of Christ are weighed one against another.
There enters then these lower parts of the world the Son of God, descending from His heavenly home and yet not quitting His Father's glory, begotten in a new order by a new nativity. In a new order, because being invisible in His own nature, He became visible in ours, and He whom nothing could contain was content to be contained : abiding before all time He began to be in time: the Lord of all things, He obscured His immeasurable majesty and took on Him the form of a servant: being God that cannot suffer, He did not disdain to be man that can, and,immortal as He is, to subject Himself to the laws of death. The Lord assumed His mother's nature without her faultiness: nor in the Lord Jesus Christ, born of the Virgin's womb, does the wonderfulness of His birth make His nature unlike ours. For He who is true God is also true man: and in this union there is no lie , since the humility of manhood and the loftiness of the Godhead both meet there. For as God is not changed by the showing of pity, so man is not swallowed up by the dignity. For each form does what is proper to it with the co-operation of the other ; that is the Word performing what appertains to the Word, and the flesh carrying out what appertains to the flesh. One of them sparkles with miracles, the other succumbs to injuries. And as the Word does not cease to be on an equality with His Father's glory, so the flesh does not forego the nature of our race. For it must again and again be repeated that one and the same is truly Son of God and truly son of man. God in that in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God John 1:l; man in that the Word became flesh and dwelt in us. God in that all things were made by Him , and without Him was nothing made:man in that He was made of a woman, made under law Galatians 4:4 . The nativity of the flesh was the manifestation of human nature: the childbearing of a virgin is the proof of Divine power. The infancy of a babe is shown in the humbleness of its cradle : the greatness of the Most High is proclaimed by the angels' voices. He whom Herod treacherously endeavours to destroy is like ourselves in our earliest stage : but He whom the Magi delight to worship on their knees is the Lord of all. So too when He came to the baptism of John, His forerunner, lest He should not be known through the veil of flesh which covered His Divinity, the Father's voice thundering from the sky, said, This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased Matthew 3:17 . And thus Him whom the devil's craftiness attacks as man, the ministries of angels serve as God. To be hungry and thirsty, to be weary, and to sleep, is clearly human: but to satisfy 5,000 men with five loaves, and to bestow on the woman of Samaria living water, droughts of which can secure the drinker from thirsting any more, to walk upon the surface of the sea with feet that do not sink, and to quell the risings of the waves by rebuking the winds, is, without any doubt, Divine. Just as therefore, to pass over many other instances, it is not part of the same nature to be moved to tears of pity for a dead friend, and when the stone that closed the four-days' grave was removed, to raise that same friend to life with a voice of command: or, to hang on the cross, and turning day to night, to make all the elements tremble: or, to be pierced with nails, and yet open the gates of paradise to the robber's faith: so it is not part of the same nature to say, I and the Father are one, and to say, the Father is greater than I. For although in the Lord Jesus Christ God and man is one person, yet the source of the degradation, which is shared by both, is one, and the source of the glory, which is shared by both, is another. For His manhood, which is less than the Father, comes from our side: His Godhead, which is equal to the Father, comes from the Father.

V. Christ's flesh is proved real from Scripture.
Therefore in consequence of this unity of person which is to be understood in both natures , we read of the Son of Man also descending from heaven, when the Son of God took flesh from the Virgin who bore Him. And again the Son of God is said to have been crucified and buried, although it was not actually in His Divinity whereby the Only-begotten is co-eternal and con-substantial with the Father, but in His weak human nature that He suffered these things. And so it is that in the Creed also we all confess that the Only-begotten Son of God was crucified and buried, according to that saying of the Apostle: for if they had known, they would never have crucified the Lord of glory 1 Corinthians 2:8 . But when our Lord and Saviour Himself would instruct His disciples' faith by His questionings, He said, Whom do men say that I, the Son of Man, am? And when they had put on record the various opinions of other people, He said, But you, whom do you say that I am? Me, that is, who am the Son of Man, and whom you see in the form of a slave, and in true flesh, whom do you say that I am? Where upon blessed Peter, whose divinely inspired confession was destined to profit all nations, said, You are Christ, the Son of the living God Matthew 16:13-16 . And not undeservedly was he pronounced blessed by the Lord, drawing from the chief corner-stone the solidity of power which his name also expresses, he, who, through the revelation of the Father, confessed Him to be at once Christ and Son of God: because the receiving of the one of these without the other was of no avail to salvation, and it was equally perilous to have believed the Lord Jesus Christ to be either only God without man, or only man without God. But after the Lord's resurrection (which, of course, was of His true body, because He was raised the same as He had died and been buried), what else was effected by the forty days' delay than the cleansing of our faith's purity from all darkness? For to that end He talked with His disciples, and dwelt and ate with them, He allowed Himself to be handled with diligent and curious touch by those who were affected by doubt, He entered when the doors were shut upon the Apostles, and by His breathing upon them gave them the Holy Spirit John 20:22, and bestowing on them the light of understanding, opened the secrets of the Holy Scriptures. Luke 24:27 So again He showed the wound in His side, the marks of the nails, and all the signs of His quite recent suffering, saying, See My hands and feet, that it is I. Handle Me and see that a spirit has not flesh and bones, as you see Me have ; in order that the properties of His Divine and human nature might be acknowledged to remain still inseparable: and that we might know the Word not to be different from the flesh, in such a sense as also to confess that the one Son of God is both the Word and flesh. Of this mystery of the faith your opponent Eutyches must be reckoned to have but little sense if he has recognized our nature in the Only-begotten of God neither through the humiliation of His having to die, nor through the glory of His rising again. Nor has he any fear of the blessed apostle and evangelist John's declaration when he says, every spirit which confesses Jesus Christ to have come in the flesh, is of God: and every spirit which destroys Jesus is not of God, and this is Antichrist. But what is to destroy Jesus, except to take away the human nature from Him, and to render void the mystery, by which alone we were saved, by the most barefaced fictions. The truth is that being in darkness about the nature of Christ's body, he must also be be fooled by the same blindness in the matter of His sufferings. For if he does not think the cross of the Lord fictitious, and does not doubt that the punishment He underwent to save the world is likewise true, let him acknowledge the flesh of Him whose death he already believes: and let him not disbelieve Him man with a body like ours, since he acknowledges Him to have been able to suffer: seeing that the denial of His true flesh is also the denial of His bodily suffering. If therefore he receives the Christian faith, and does not turn away his ears from the preaching of the Gospel: let him see what was the nature that hung pierced with nails on the wooden cross, and, when the side of the Crucified was opened by the soldier's spear, let him understand whence it was that blood and water flowed, that the Church of God might be watered from the font and from the cup. Let him hear also the blessed Apostle Peter, proclaiming that the sanctification of the Spirit takes place through the sprinkling of Christ's blood. And let him not read cursorily the same Apostle's words when he says, Knowing that not with corruptible things, such as silver and gold, have you been redeemed from your vain manner of life which is part of your fathers' tradition, but with the precious blood of Jesus Christ as of a lamb without spot and blemish 1 Peter 1:18 . Let him not resist too the witness of the blessed Apostle John, who says: and the blood of Jesus the Son of God cleanses us from all sin 1 John 1:7 . And again: this is the victory which overcomes the world, our faith. And who is He that overcomes the world save He that believes that Jesus is the Son of God. This is He that came by water and blood, Jesus Christ: not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that testifies, because the Spirit is the truth , because there are three that bear witness, the Spirit, the water and the blood, and the three are one. The Spirit, that is, of sanctification, and the blood of redemption, and the water of baptism: because the three are one, and remain undivided, and none of them is separated from this connection; because the Catholic Church lives and progresses by this faith, so that in Christ Jesus neither the manhood without the true Godhead nor the Godhead without the true manhood is believed in.

VI. The wrong and mischievous concession of Eutyches. The terms on which he may be restored to Communion. The sending of deputies to the east.
But when during your cross-examination Eutyches replied and said, I confess that our Lord had two natures before the union but after the union I confess but one , I am surprised that so absurd and mistaken a statement of his should not have been criticised and rebuked by his judges, and that an utterance which reaches the height of stupidity and blasphemy should be allowed to pass as if nothing offensive had been heard: for the impiety of saying that the Son of God was of two natures before His incarnation is only equaled by the iniquity of asserting that there was but one nature in Him after the Word became flesh. And to the end that Eutyches may not think this a right or defensible opinion because it was not contradicted by any expression of yourselves, we warn you beloved brother, to take anxious care that if ever through the inspiration of God's mercy the case is brought to a satisfactory conclusion, his ignorant mind be purged from this pernicious idea as well as others. He was, indeed,just beginning to beat a retreat from his erroneous conviction, as the order of proceedings shows , in so far as when hemmed in by your remonstrances he agreed to say what he had not said before and to acquiesce in that belief to which before he had been opposed. However, when he refused to give his consent to the anathematizing of his blasphemous dogma, you understood, brother , that he abode by his treachery and deserved to receive a verdict of condemnation. And yet, if he grieves over it faithfully and to good purpose, and, late though it be, acknowledges how rightly the bishops' authority has been set in motion; or if with his own mouth and hand in your presence he recants his wrong opinions, no mercy that is shown to him when penitent can be found fault with : because our Lord, that true and good shepherd who laid down His life for His sheep and who came to save not lose men's souls Luke 9:50, wishes us to imitate His kindness ; in order that while justice constrains us when we sin, mercy may prevent our rejection when we have returned. For then at last is the true Faith most profitably defended when a false belief is condemned even by the supporters of it.

Now for the loyal and faithful execution of the whole matter, we have appointed to represent us our brothers Julius Bishop and Renatus priest [of the Title of S. Clement], as well as my son Hilary , deacon. And with them we have associated Dulcitius our notary, whose faith is well approved: being sure that the Divine help will be given us, so that he who had erred may be saved when the wrongness of his view has been condemned. God keep you safe, beloved brother.

The 13 June, 449, in the consulship of the most illustrious Asturius and Protogenes.

Modernism Confusion Fueled by Pope Francis

This Bishop is clearly a Modernist on at least a couple of points:

1. That "science" trumps Christ's teachings.
2. Scripture is to be re-interpreted to adapt to the opinions of men.

Cf. The Syllabus of Errors, Blessed Pope Pius IX and Lamentabili Sane, Pope Saint Pius X

N.B. Pope Benedict XI is the Pope who did the most work to academically correct the errors of Modernism and Rationalism condemned in the above documents, working arduously for more than half a century to answer and correct those errors against the truth of God.

What God is clearly telling us in this confusing time of Pope Francis is that we should continue to read and further the work begun by Pope Benedict. Clarity of doctrine and moral teaching, along with holiness of life, must be furthered, because the enemy is constantly trying to confuse everything.

All this reminds me of Freemasonry, masterful in it's mixture of truth with error.

Remember it well, truth mixed with error is error!

That is precisely what Catholics (true Christians) call heresy. You don't have to be wrong in everything to be a heretic. You just have to err on one essential element of the faith and you are a heretic.

The false notion that there is salvation in vagueness and error and immorality is to be roundly rejected by all honest men!

"Gay" Priest Parties

Surely Pope Francis must be aware of this widespread problem and yet his rhetoric continues to be directed toward the tolerance and acceptance of this abominable scandal of which the notorious pederasty is just the tip of the iceberg of corruption and accompanying hypocrisy of "The Church of Nice."

The problem with "not judging" is that it protects the perverse and enables them to pervert and abuse the innocent. Every man in authority must judge the men (and women) under him and seek to ensure their uprightness, otherwise the leader himself is corrupt! because you can tell a man by his friends.

Pray for Michael Voris. I have reason to suppose the devil is beating him up pretty bad!

Below is an introductory video on the insidious evil of masturbation!


On Noise

Have you noticed that many people of whatever culture in our world today do not know how to throw a party without excessive and very loud noise? So I looked into noise measurement.

Noise is measured by decibels.
  • Near total silence - 0 dB
  • A whisper - 15 dB
  • Normal conversation - 60 dB
  • A lawnmower - 90 dB
  • A car horn - 110 dB
  • A rock concert or a jet engine - 120 dB
  • A gunshot or firecracker - 140 dB

So, shouting is around 85 dB. If you are at an affair and you have to shout to be heard by the person beside you, the noise is 90 dB if you can understand each others' shoutings. If you cannot hear each other the level is over 100 dB and you are entering a range which may seriously damage your hearing! Get out of there!

P.S. Music at a social function (or any other type of noise for that matter) should not be habitually higher than normal conversation, so people can talk! Otherwise it is not a social function but the interaction is reduced to a subhuman level: i.e. no intelligent communication (except perhaps by texting!). Intelligent communication takes place primarily in the exchange of conversation.

Seek silence: blaring noise is one of the enemies of peace! 

History's 100 Most Influential People: Catholic Christianity is Number One Influence, Bar None!

Below is the copy of a webpage of adherents.com, (Mormon?), taken from a 1992 publication (noted below). A hundred runners up are also listed, also among whom Catholicism is the greatest religion.

The order of rank in the list is patently wrong at least in that Jesus Christ is listed third on the list, only after Muhammad and Isaac Newton! Clearly an error at least for the fact that both Muhammad and Newton themselves were heavily influenced by Jesus Christ's historical heritage; and therefore, any influence they have on history is surely also indebted to Christ!

N.B. Many other minor details of the survey are also clearly biased exaggerations (e.g. that Cortes destroyed the Aztec civilization? What about the Aztec blood of the vast majority of the 100 million Mexicans today. Or does one assume that a culture is destroyed when it becomes Catholic. Mexico converted, it was not at all destroyed but enabled to flourish but its new found and beloved religion which so naturally complimented and purified the best elements of the primitive pagan religions). The striking undeniable reality is that Catholicism has an undeniably illustrious past, present and future! every one (even the demons) must admit that! Praise be Jesus Christ!
All of this being said, one must also consider that this is all from the 21st Century Western Civilization vantage point.
The Asian Civilization(s) would certainly produce a quite different list, the universal historical influence of which must be largely contested because of the limited influence Asian culture has on the West, even today!

Religious Affiliation% in
List
Catholic31%
Anglican/Episcopalian13%
Jewish7%
Atheist6%
Greco-Roman paganism6%
Chinese traditional religion/Confucianism5%
Lutheran5%
Russian Orthodox4%
pre-Nicene Christianity3%
Platonism3%
Islam2%
Hindu2%
Buddhist2%
Presbyterian2%
Zoroastrian2%
Manicheanism2%
Quaker2%
Unitarian/Universalist2%
Calvinist2%
Jain1%
Jansenist1%
United Brethren1%
Congregationalist1%
Dutch Reformed1%
Egyptian paganism1%
Mongolian shamanism1%
Taoism1%
Baptist1%
Sandemanian1%
Protestant (denomination unknown)6%
unknown5%
The following list of influential figures from world history comes from Michael H. Hart's book The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History. In the book, Hart provides brief biographies of each of the individuals, as well as reasons for their ranking.
Adherents.com takes no position regarding the validity of Hart's rankings. Certainly ranking the relative historical influence of individuals is a subjective process. We welcome and will by happy to post comments from readers suggesting alternative rankings or names of influential individuals who should be included in the "Top 100." (Please send suggestions to webmaster@adherents.com).
This list of names and their ranks are solely the work of Michael H. Hart. The columns "Religious Affiliation" and "Influence" are the work of Adherents.com. We will readily modify notes if there are any inaccuracies.
Note that many influential philosophies (such as Marxist Communism or Confucianism) are not always classified as organized "religions" in the traditional sense, but are classified as such by sociologists because they are a primary motivational worldview for individuals, cultures or subcultures. Also, many founders never considered themselves adherents of philosophies or religions which later bore their name (e.g., Martin Luther and Lutheranism).
In the table below, where there are two religions listed, the first one is the religion the person was born into. The second was the religion or philosophy the person later joined or founded. Comments in the "Influence" column are in bold when the influence is mainly in the realm of religion and philosophy. 
RankNameReligious AffiliationInfluence
1MuhammadIslamProphet of Islam; conqueror of Arabia; Hart recognized that ranking Muhammad first might be controversial, but felt that, from a secular historian's perspective, this was the correct choice because Muhammad is the only man to have been both a founder of a major world religion and a major military/political leader. More
2Isaac NewtonAnglican (rejected Trinitarianism, i.e.,
Athanasianism; believed in the Arianism
of the Primitive Church)
physicist; theory of universal gravitation; laws of motion
3Jesus Christ *Judaism; Christianityfounder of Christianity
4BuddhaHinduism; Buddhismfounder of Buddhism
5ConfuciusConfucianismfounder of Confucianism
6St. PaulJudaism; Christianityproselytizer of Christianity
7Ts'ai LunChinese traditional religioninventor of paper
8Johann GutenbergCatholicdeveloped movable type; printed Bibles
9Christopher ColumbusCatholicexplorer; led Europe to Americas
10Albert EinsteinJewishphysicist; relativity; Einsteinian physics
11Louis PasteurCatholicscientist; pasteurization
12Galileo GalileiCatholicastronomer; accurately described heliocentric solar system
13AristotlePlatonism / Greek philosophyinfluential Greek philosopher
14EuclidPlatonism / Greek philosophymathematician; Euclidian geometry
15MosesJudaismmajor prophet of Judaism
16Charles DarwinAnglican (nominal); Unitarianbiologist; described Darwinian evolution, whichhad theological impact on many religions
17Shih Huang TiChinese traditional religionChinese emperor
18Augustus CaesarRoman state paganismruler
19Nicolaus CopernicusCatholic (priest)astronomer; taught heliocentricity
20Antoine Laurent LavoisierCatholicfather of modern chemistry; philosopher; economist
21Constantine the GreatRoman state paganism; ChristianityRoman emperor who completely legalized Christianity, leading to its status as state religion. Convened the First Council of Nicaea that produced the Nicene Creed, which rejected Arianism (one of two major strains of Christian thought) and established Athanasianism (Trinitarianism, the other strain) as "official doctrine."
22James WattPresbyterian (lapsed)developed steam engine
23Michael FaradaySandemanianphysicist; chemist; discovery of magneto-electricity
24James Clerk MaxwellPresbyterian; Anglican; Baptistphysicist; electromagnetic spectrum
25Martin LutherCatholic; Lutheranfounder of Protestantism and Lutheranism
26George WashingtonEpiscopalianfirst president of United States
27Karl MarxJewish; Lutheran;
Atheist; Marxism/Communism
founder of Marxism, Marxist Communism
28Orville and Wilbur WrightUnited Brethreninventors of airplane
29Genghis KhanMongolian shamanismMongol conqueror
30Adam SmithLiberal Protestanteconomist; philosopher; expositor of capitalism; author: The Theory of Moral Sentiments
31Edward de Vere
a.k.a. William Shakespeare
Catholic; Anglicanliterature; also wrote 6 volumes about philosophy and religion
32John DaltonQuakerchemist; physicist; atomic theory; law of partial pressures (Dalton's law)
33Alexander the GreatGreek state paganismconqueror
34Napoleon BonaparteCatholic (nominal)French conqueror
35Thomas EdisonCongregationalist; agnosticinventor of light bulb, phonograph, etc.
36Antony van LeeuwenhoekDutch Reformedmicroscopes; studied microscopic life
37William T.G. Morton??pioneer in anesthesiology
38Guglielmo MarconiCatholic and Anglicaninventor of radio
39Adolf HitlerNazism; born/raised in, but rejected Catholicismconqueror; led Axis Powers in WWII
40PlatoPlatonism / Greek philosophyfounder of Platonism
41Oliver CromwellPuritan (Protestant)British political and military leader
42Alexander Graham BellUnitarian/Universalistinventor of telephone *
43Alexander FlemingCatholicpenicillin; advances in bacteriology, immunology and chemotherapy
44John Lockeraised Puritan (Anglican);
Liberal Christian
philosopher and liberal theologian
45Ludwig van BeethovenCatholiccomposer
46Werner HeisenbergLutherana founder of quantum mechanics; discovered principle of uncertainty; head of Nazi Germany's nuclear program
47Louis Daguerre??an inventor/pioneer of photography
48Simon BolivarCatholic (nominal); AtheistNational hero of Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia
49Rene DescartesCatholicRationalist philosopher and mathematician
50MichelangeloCatholicpainter; sculptor; architect
51Pope Urban IICatholiccalled for First Crusade
52'Umar ibn al-KhattabIslamSecond Caliph; expanded Muslim empire
53AsokaBuddhismking of India who converted to and spread Buddhism
54St. AugustineGreek state paganism; Manicheanism; CatholicEarly Christian theologian
55William HarveyAnglican (nominal)described the circulation of blood; wroteEssays on the Generation of Animals, the basis for modern embryology
56Ernest Rutherford??physicist; pioneer of subatomic physics
57John CalvinProtestant; CalvinismProtestant reformer; founder of Calvinism
58Gregor MendelCatholic (Augustinian monk)Mendelian genetics
59Max PlanckProtestantphysicist; thermodynamics
60Joseph ListerQuakerprincipal discoverer of antiseptics which greatly reduced surgical mortality
61Nikolaus August Otto??built first four-stroke internal combustion engine
62Francisco PizarroCatholicSpanish conqueror in South America;defeated Incas
63Hernando CortesCatholicconquered Mexico for Spain; through war and introduction of new diseases he largelydestroyed Aztec civilization
64Thomas JeffersonEpiscopalian; Deist3rd president of United States
65Queen Isabella ICatholicSpanish ruler
66Joseph StalinRussian Orthodox; Atheist; Marxismrevolutionary and ruler of USSR
67Julius CaesarRoman state paganismRoman emperor
68William the ConquerorCatholiclaid foundation of modern England
69Sigmund FreudJewish; atheist; Freudian psychology/psychoanalysisfounded Freudian school of psychology/psychoanalysis (i.e., the "religion of Freudianism")
70Edward JennerAnglicandiscoverer of the vaccination for smallpox
71Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen??discovered X-rays
72Johann Sebastian BachLutheran; Catholiccomposer
73Lao TzuTaoismfounder of Taoism
74Voltaireraised in Jansenism;
later Deist
writer and philosopher; wrote Candide
75Johannes KeplerLutheranastronomer; planetary motions
76Enrico FermiCatholicinitiated the atomic age; father of atom bomb
77Leonhard EulerCalvinistphysicist; mathematician; differential and integral calculus and algebra
78Jean-Jacques Rousseauborn Protestant;
converted as a teen to Catholic;
later Deist
French deistic philosopher and author
79Nicoli MachiavelliCatholicwrote The Prince (influential political treatise)
80Thomas MalthusAnglican (cleric)economist; wrote Essay on the Principle of Population
81John F. KennedyCatholicU.S. President who led first successful effort by humans to travel to another "planet"
82Gregory PincusJewishendocrinologist; developed birth-control pill
83ManiManicheanismfounder of Manicheanism, once a world religion which rivaled Christianity in strength
84LeninRussian Orthodox;
Atheist; Marxism/Communism
Russian ruler
85Sui Wen TiChinese traditional religionunified China
86Vasco da GamaCatholicnavigator; discovered route from Europe to India around Cape Hood
87Cyrus the GreatZoroastrianismfounder of Persian empire
88Peter the GreatRussian Orthodoxforged Russia into a great European nation
89Mao ZedongAtheist; Communism; Maoismfounder of Maoism, Chinese form of Communism
90Francis BaconAnglicanphilosopher; delineated inductive scientific method
91Henry FordProtestantdeveloped automobile; achievement in manufacturing and assembly
92MenciusConfucianismphilosopher; founder of a school of Confucianism
93ZoroasterZoroastrianismfounder of Zoroastrianism
94Queen Elizabeth IAnglicanBritish monarch; restored Church of England to power after Queen Mary
95Mikhail GorbachevRussian OrthodoxRussian premier who helped end Communism in USSR
96MenesEgyptian paganismunified Upper and Lower Egypt
97CharlemagneCatholicHoly Roman Empire created with his baptism in 800 AD
98HomerGreek paganismepic poet
99Justinian ICatholicRoman emperor; reconquered Mediterranean empire; accelerated Catholic-Monophysite schism
100MahaviraHinduism; Jainismfounder of Jainism
Source of list of names: Hart, Michael H. The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, Revised and Updated for the Nineties. New York: Carol Publishing Group/Citadel Press; first published in 1978, reprinted with minor revisions (reflected above) in 1992.

Religious Affiliation of History's 100 Most Influential People
- Overflow Page -

The 100: The Most Influential Persons in History
Runners Up

From: Michael H. Hart, The 100: A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History, 1978; pages 517-518:
While this book was being written, many friends and associates of the author suggested suggested the names of various historical figures who they felt might reasonably be included in the main section of the book.
Quite a few of those suggestions were adopted; others, for one reason or another, were rejected. Below are the names of a hundred interesting figures who, the author finally concluded, do not belong among the 100 most influential persons in history -- although, undoubtedly, strong arguments can be made on behalf of a considerable number of these persons.
On the succeeding pages are brief articles about ten of those figures, indicating the author's reasons for omitting them from the top hundred. It should not be assumed that the author thinks that those ten (in some order) would be numbers 101-110 if the main list were extended, or that the persons named below would be numbers 100-200.
[The 100 runners-up in this afterword are first listed alphabetically, followed by brief chapters of 10 of the individuals, who we have listed first below.]
RankNameReligious AffiliationInfluence
RUSt. Thomas AquinasCatholicinfluential early Christian philosopher
RUArchimedesGreek philosophyfather of experimental science
RUCharles BabbageAnglicanmathematician and inventor of forerunner of computer
RUCheopsEgyptian paganismEgyptian ruler; builder of Great Pyramid
RUMarie CurieCatholic (lapsed)physicist; radioactivity
RUBenjamin FranklinPresbyterian; DeistAmerican politician and inventor
RUMohandas GandhiHinduism; influenced by Jainism (mother was a Jain)Indian leader and Hindu religious reformer
RUAbraham LincolnRegular Baptist (childhood);
later ambiguous -
Deist, general theist or
a very personalized Christianity
16th president of U.S.; led during Civil War
RUFerdinand MagellanCatholicnavigator; named Pacific Ocean; first circumnavigation of globe
RULeonardo da VinciCatholicartist; inventor
Abraham
Aesop
Howard H. Aiken
Susan B. Anthony
St. Thomas Aquinas
Archimedes
Aristarchus of Samos
Neil Armstrong
Charle Babbage
Jeremy Bentham
Otto von Bismark
Robert Boyle
Louis de Broglie
Nicolas Sadi Carnot
Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor
Cheops (Khufu)
Chu Hsi
Winston Churchill
Karl von Clausewitz
Rudolf Clausius
Marie Curie
Gottlieb Daimler
Dante Alighieri
Darius the Great
King David
Democritus
Mary Baker Eddy
Robert C.W. Ettinger
Henry Ford
George Fox
Benjamin Franklin
Frederick the Great
Betty Friedan
Galen
Mohandas K. Gandhi
Karl Friedrich Gauss
Hammurabi
Han Wu Ti
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
Henry VIII
Henry the Navigator
Theodor Herzl
Hippocrates
Thomas Hobbes
James Hutton
Ikhnaton
Isaiah
Joan of Arc
Joseph Marie Jacquard
Immanuel Kant
John Maynard Keynes
Har Gobind Khorana
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Alfred C. Kinsey
Kublai Khan
Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz
Etienne Lenoir
Leonardo da Vinci
Abraham Lincoln
Liu Pang (Han Kao Tsu)
Louis XIV
James Madison
Ferdinand Magellan
The Virgin Mary
Meiji Tenno (Emperor Mutsuhito)
Sultan Mohammed (Mehmed) II
Montesquieu
Maria Montessori
Samuel Morse
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Muawiya I
Gerard K. O'Neill
Blaise Pascal
Ivan Pavlov
Marco Polo
Ptolemy (Claudius Ptolemaeus)
Pythagoras
Rembrandt
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Sankara
Sargon of Akkad
Erwin Schrodinger
William B. Shockley
Joseph Smith
Socrates
Sophocles
Sun Yat-sen
William Henry Fox Talbot
Tamerlane
T'ang T'ai Tsung
Edward Teller
Henry David Thoreau
Leo Tolstoy
Charles H. Townes
Harry S. Truman
Selman A. Waksman
James D. Watson
Mary Wollstonecraft
Frank Lloyd Wright
Vladimir Zworykin
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...